SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Osicom(FIBR)
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10479 52 0 FIBR
Emcee:  Wes Hinson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9629 Now that the bickering I hope is over, The real purpose of this medium is "Scott Ozer-5/2/1999
9628 So your theory is there is some sinister "sales force" pumping FIBR sDennis G.-5/1/1999
9627 vibaby, the price is irrelevant. I don't feel like a fool because there isMama Bear-5/1/1999
9626 You seem to have been negative on the stock from 2-1/2 to 20+ dollars dearie alvibaby-5/1/1999
9625 vibaby, and exactly how has FIBR made me look like a fool? It isn't like tMama Bear-5/1/1999
9624 <<A: Selling sham stock to sheep: Q:"Someone help me understand the vibaby-5/1/1999
9623 A: Selling sham stock to sheep: Q:"Someone help me understand the core comSir Auric Goldfinger-5/1/1999
9622 The recommendation was from Stockwinners.com. They recommended it once befor aScott Ozer-4/30/1999
9621 I must have been there too long because I do not understand your response. mad dog from over there-4/30/1999
9620 Scott: Are these your recommendations or are they from another source? Brian Brian-4/30/1999
9619 New recommendation!!!!!! Markets opened higher and are solidly in positive terrScott Ozer-4/30/1999
9618 If the Osi haters were not so hardheaded about their opinions they could be makDennis G.-4/30/1999
9617 How could it not be a great buy at 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14....... glad to knowScott Ozer-4/30/1999
9616 Osicom Tech. Reiterated Long-Term 'Buy' at The Chapman Company quote.blBrian-4/30/1999
9615 Charles: Good post, to which I can only add that should you use margin on a hiJohn Curtis-4/29/1999
9614 rename auric to ohdickvibaby-4/29/1999
9613 Regis: You can also browse through the NetSilcon website at netsilicon.com or Brian-4/29/1999
9612 Regis- The Bloomberg article was a SHAM! I for one will probably be contributinsteve worthington-4/29/1999
9611 Thanx Brian, another Q, the IPO of the NetSilicon must be something special. WRegis McConnell-4/29/1999
9610 Regis: IMO the stock did not drop 75% of its value because they lost a contracBrian-4/29/1999
9609 What is the basis for this stocks recent rebound in the face of such 'bad nRegis McConnell-4/29/1999
9608 I agree with Mama Bear - I don't think Auric has a clue about trading succeDavid Wise-4/29/1999
9607 Scott, my thoughts exactly. Besides, the courts would throw this out in a day.David Wise-4/29/1999
9606 Funny questions you ask! Where have you been? Oh, I see, "over there&quoDavid Wise-4/29/1999
9605 I'm concluding that beginning today Mama Bear is gonna be Running Bare. David Wise-4/29/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News