SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Actual left/right wing discussion
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
10087 36 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9637<i>"Here is one useful link on the naturalistic fallacy:"</i&Oeconomicus-1/2/2011
9636Here is one useful link on the naturalistic fallacy: richmond-philosophy.net Tneolib-1/2/2011
9635<i>No, my discussion did not mix physics to human behavior.</i> Welneolib-1/2/2011
9634<i>Yes, and the point is to understand what their rational was, not diagraLane3-1/2/2011
9633<i>(Actually, I think equality in creation is deduced, in Locke's arguLane3-1/2/2011
9632<b>"What exactly do you think is "natural law"? Your discusone_less-1/2/2011
9631I think you are kicking the can down the road here: Natural Rights -> Naturaneolib-1/1/2011
9630<I>... studies can be designed to tickle out the differences between learnTimF-1/1/2011
9629Three Wrongs Don't Make a Right: Thaler on Estate Taxes In a recent New YorTimF-1/1/2011
9628I'm wondering if you and I interpreted the question differently. <b>one_less-1/1/2011
9627I would have answered differently. (I wonder if that means that I don't undeJacques Chitte-1/1/2011
9626I'm going to back the natural rights issue up one step for a moment. What exone_less-1/1/2011
9625Yes, and the point is to understand what their rational was, not diagram the senneolib-1/1/2011
9624<i>. None of this is considered harmful except in the case of environmentaneolib-1/1/2011
9623Not sure where you were going with this but you have a good point. Human beings one_less-1/1/2011
9622Well said, Lane. Now, as to whether the cited natural rights were or can be deOeconomicus21/1/2011
9621<i>They want the equality and the rights to be on equal footing,</i>Lane3-1/1/2011
9620<i>Your eating, generally requires the death of some other form of life. &Lane3-1/1/2011
9619I remember a spectacular failure caused by this absence of communication of ideaJacques Chitte-1/1/2011
9618No, it was evident from the corpus of enlightenment philosophers' thought onJacques Chitte-1/1/2011
9617No kidding, its the major issue in Vet care as well. Animals don't tell youneolib-1/1/2011
9616yes, I've been pointing out all along that the appeal to authority is in faneolib-1/1/2011
9615<i>What a horrid notion!</i> Your eating, generally requires the deneolib-1/1/2011
9614>There is a pretty obvious advantage to being able to query the subject, and Jacques Chitte-1/1/2011
9613Yes, the claim of equality is central. It is necessary (I don't know if it iJacques Chitte-1/1/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):