SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Network Appliance
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10934 322 0 NTAP
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9659<i>One idea would be to sell...Or use limit sell orders...Maybe sell the fBirdDog-12/12/2001
9658<i>Let me rephrase: discussing the technology is a necessary, but not suffBirdDog-12/12/2001
9657<i>........and you all can thank me for ntaps fine performance as of late.BirdDog-12/12/2001
9656re: something going on... OR it's: Short Covering + Momo piling on + Share RClaude-12/12/2001
9655DS is still here - we recently had a nice chat about mutual Thanksgiving dinnersPeter Sherman-12/12/2001
9654You might want to look at selling calls, say with strikes of 25 or 30 (or higheralanrs-12/12/2001
9653re: Do you think that Jerry erred in his opinions regarding ntap's technologJacob Snyder-12/12/2001
9652Jacob, Thanks for your response. Since none of those brilliant ideas worked, I tripperd2-12/12/2001
9651>> re: where do you think he erred? You plucked that quote our of contestUncle Frank-12/12/2001
9650I agree, something is going on here, someone (not me) knows something, and it haJacob Snyder-12/12/2001
9649>> I do not enjoy seeing people lose money. Your own words reveal that clUncle Frank-12/12/2001
9648Thanks, now I have a question for you. I have a fairly large position in NTAP intripperd2-12/12/2001
9647OK, that's fair. I have learned much of what I know about the technology froJacob Snyder-12/12/2001
9646Jacob, I understand your point, but we all have different strengths. (there are tripperd2-12/12/2001
9645re: where do you think he erred? Let's not let this get personal, but: An Jacob Snyder-12/12/2001
9644If it's such a steal at $20, why not at $23.5? You'll be able to buy baSecularBull-12/12/2001
9643You're all wrong. It was the Wedbush-Morgan upgrade!<gg> 100 PS: To 100cfm-12/12/2001
9642<<No, I take credit for the rise. I sold all of mine at lower levels. ~SB~im a survivor-12/12/2001
9641No, I take credit for the rise. I sold all of mine at lower levels. ~SB~SecularBull-12/12/2001
9640Until very recently, during the last year or so you've probably made a bundlSecularBull-12/12/2001
9639>>I hate to spoil your enjoyment of others' losses See there you go aJakeStraw-12/12/2001
9638>> Hope you're finally breaking even on those shares you were braggingUncle Frank-12/12/2001
9637Yall can quit bitching at each other........and you all can thank me for ntaps fim a survivor-12/12/2001
9636>>Someone who actually listened to your perma-bear psuedo-valuation crap wJakeStraw-12/12/2001
9635>> IMO he was not objective & refused to accept, at the time, the inevUncle Frank-12/12/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News