SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Actual left/right wing discussion
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
10087 36 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9662If one were looking at "natural rights" and "natural laws" aneolib-1/2/2011
9661Yes exactly, I was planning on using that example as well, but if one defines thneolib-1/2/2011
9660"All men created equal" includes other races, but that text was not coJacques Chitte-1/2/2011
9659Bah Complex Regulation By Robin Hanson · November 20, 2010 8:00 pm There aTimF-1/2/2011
9658<i> The founding fathers are not here, if they were I'd like to hear tneolib-1/2/2011
9657<i> The term 'Right to Life' is something we specifically to humanneolib-1/2/2011
9656Chimpanzees have been observed killing others of their kind without any reason tJacques Chitte-1/2/2011
9655Yeah, I figured you'd like that one when I made the post. However, you mighneolib-1/2/2011
9654<b>"What is "obvious" to you today,</b> The foundingone_less-1/2/2011
9653<b>"Do you think that "Right to Life" is thus a right whichone_less-1/2/2011
9652<i>'What is "obvious" to you today, is different than what wOeconomicus-1/2/2011
9651<i> The list I provided for you (and which you ignored) are obvious facts neolib-1/2/2011
9650<i>"IMHO, the best comment from the Wiki article on natural rights.&qOeconomicus-1/2/2011
9649<b>"Although we think we have some reasonable understanding of physicone_less-1/2/2011
9648<i>We are all at a table together, deciding which rules to adopt, free froneolib-1/2/2011
9647I stand corrected, since murder is thus defined to be species specific. This dneolib-1/2/2011
9646You also "keep for getting" [sic] to debate in good faith.Oeconomicus11/2/2011
9645<i>'but the point remains, that one can't be sloppy about claimingOeconomicus-1/2/2011
9644Ah, I do keep for getting, that rights are something which just pop out of the vneolib-1/2/2011
9643<b>>The rest of the animal kingdom does not murder.< <"Eithone_less-1/2/2011
9642<i>'Pretty much all the claims of "natural rights" commit thOeconomicus-1/2/2011
9641I'm happy to note of course, that many people don't think its a fallacy.neolib-1/2/2011
9640Pretty much all the claims of "natural rights" commit that fallacy. Nneolib-1/2/2011
9639I read your link. It has no apparent connection to anything here other than thatOeconomicus-1/2/2011
9638If you read up on it, hopefully it should be clear.neolib-1/2/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News