SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol SI Sentiment
10293 141 0 REFR ★★★★★ (Strong Buy)
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9668Re: CHINKS IN THE ARMOR by: N_Dixon Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Buy 05/15/03 0N. Dixon-5/15/2003
9667Tell it to Air Products. They aren't so "puny": Message 18937256N. Dixon-5/15/2003
9666Hey Nancy: Why is it that every stock you have ever touted on SI has been a losinchingup-5/15/2003
9665www.asensioexposed.com - UPDATE by: asensio_fraud_exposed 05/14/03 09:26 pm MsgN. Dixon-5/14/2003
9664N. Dixon, would you state for the record: male or female?Sir Auric Goldfinger-5/7/2003
9663Bought T on M.Lynch comments in the mid 16's. Sold June 17 1/2 covered callBill Wexler-5/6/2003
9662No reason to sell LOR and LU (despite recent runups), might even buy a little mBill Wexler-5/6/2003
9661Buying McDonalds (MCD) January 2004 LEAPS (LNMAB - strike price 10) at 7.50. WiBill Wexler-5/5/2003
9660Re: Shorts on SI singing an old tune by: dollyinvirginia (F/DC burbs) Long-TerN. Dixon-5/4/2003
9659<I>We don't care if we're just the enlightened few who know what wKevin Podsiadlik-5/4/2003
9658<I>would that be for the longest period of time avoiding bankruptcy while Kevin Podsiadlik-5/4/2003
9657<b><i> What's important is that SPD is in mass commercializationRockyBalboa-5/4/2003
9656<i>would that be for the longest period of time avoiding bankruptcy while N. Dixon-5/3/2003
9655Re "airline industry's highest award", would that be for the longeMark Marcellus-5/3/2003
9654Just because, I don't, I'm not, and, just because.Kevin Podsiadlik-5/3/2003
9653<I>There is a very tiny group of detractors and "billwexler" is Kevin Podsiadlik-5/3/2003
9652<I>http://www.sae.org/aeromag/toptech/12-2002/page2.htm</I> SniggerKevin Podsiadlik-5/3/2003
9651Now both your questions are answered. Answer mine: Re: by: N_Dixon Long-Term N. Dixon-5/3/2003
9650<i>do you even accept as a remote possibility, the notion that Bill WexlerN. Dixon-5/3/2003
9649<i>my other question about that "airline industry's highest awardN. Dixon-5/3/2003
9648Basher Wake-Up Call by: harvardbillpayer (55/M/Massachusetts) Long-Term SentimeN. Dixon-5/3/2003
9647Sorry to be so lax in responding but I have many things on my plate these days aHank-5/2/2003
9646Inquiring minds want to know when you'll answer MY question. Or for that maKevin Podsiadlik-5/2/2003
9645Kevin answering for Bill, how odd - NOT! What <i>compels</i> you tN. Dixon-5/2/2003
9644Dixie-chick, dear, do you even accept as a <B>remote</b> possibilityKevin Podsiadlik-5/2/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News