SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACLY- ACCELR8. Year 2000 Stock
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1518 7 0 ACLY
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
968 Looks like the stock is falling into a trading range. Don't see an unpwardP. Ramamoorthy-1/21/1998
967 Taoman, nope. I just look at the chart. Kathy Riley-1/21/1998
966 Bill, depends on how you define "migration". In the context of <i&Jeffrey S. Mitchell-1/21/1998
965 Ed, CNBC just had a story with an analyst talking about Microsoft (missed his nCalculatedRisk-1/21/1998
964ThirdEye-1/21/1998
963 Marshall, I tend to intepret the term migration in a broader sense that not onEd Zhao-1/21/1998
962 Eager to see more of your insights! XZEd Zhao-1/21/1998
961 Taoman, my idle observation today is I believe the stock is rising. I guess ifKathy Riley-1/20/1998
960 Bill, IMO, an idle observation that I made with NO information whatsoever does ThirdEye-1/20/1998
959 taoman, here is a "rumor" of a short attack on ACLY: Question: exchanCalculatedRisk-1/20/1998
958 Bill, please! Your continuous leaps from idle musing to "rumour" to &ThirdEye-1/20/1998
957 Yes, now we know, CR. Actually, in running my charts tonite, I would say ACLY Kathy Riley-1/20/1998
956 Yep. Good post, RM. I don't like seeing migration being discussed as an opKathy Riley-1/19/1998
955 No doubt about it. CR, nz and and their Shortshrift gang have clearly dedicateR. M. Rosenthal-1/19/1998
954 Ed, I dont mean to be negative but your question is exactly why I dont have coHands Off-1/19/1998
953 33 employees at 12/3/97-I took notes from the last conference call. Also companonzeroa-1/19/1998
952 Accelr8 just doesn't have the infrastructure to grow the Company's reveKathy Riley-1/19/1998
951 Allan, Mr. Geimer mentioned the number of employees in the last cc - but I didnCalculatedRisk-1/19/1998
950 According to the company profile accessible from Yahoo quotes ACLY has 30 emploctirry-1/19/1998
949 Ed, Tom has said that most customers at this point are doing the fix first andKathy Riley-1/19/1998
948 Bill, Nice work on the ACLY story. There is one last angle I would be interestAllan F-1/19/1998
947 Marshall, Can you or anyone long in ACLY in this board explain why there'sEd Zhao-1/19/1998
946 Humbly report, Dear (Drahota = Dear, Expensive, Costly in Czech), CalculatedRisJosef Svejk-1/18/1998
945 Why are you so concerned for us? You keep writing on this thread all the time, Paul R. Drahota-1/18/1998
944 Bill. Thanks for your detailed and informative posts. I have a question abouthasbeen101-1/18/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News