SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF Portfolio
An SI Board Since August 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1073 31 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
973 >> I also meant to ask, humbly, because I'm not an expert fund managescaram(o)uche-6/18/1999
972 <Going forward, we're going to kick butt.> In my own verbose way, I John Metcalf-6/18/1999
971 >> Since last Labor Day, the AMEX Biotech index has roughly doubled. <scaram(o)uche-6/18/1999
970 Pardon this assertion of fact: Since last Labor Day, the AMEX Biotech index haJohn Metcalf-6/17/1999
969 <Points very well taken, but we're into minutia> Totally agree... jLLCF-6/17/1999
968 >> Wouldn't the portfolio have to pay taxes then to compare to the fuscaram(o)uche-6/17/1999
967 < should I sell SUGN out of the portfolio and redeploy, or wait for the guarLLCF-6/17/1999
966 The portfolio's performance reflects not only a selection of stocks based oscaram(o)uche-6/17/1999
965 With respect to Pfizer...... I see strong performance going forward for a coscaram(o)uche-6/17/1999
964 >> wouldn't be a bit fairer to use similar time points to compare scaram(o)uche-6/17/1999
963 Rick, it is not my intention to derail the continued and <b>deserved</Pseudo Biologist-6/17/1999
962 Kurt von Emster: You indicated, at the Informed Investors Forum, that you moniscaram(o)uche-6/17/1999
961 At 9 1/2 months, "bounce" finally bounces through the +80% barrier. Sscaram(o)uche-6/17/1999
960 a new issue, light weighting to reflect risk, added to "neuro" at curscaram(o)uche-6/17/1999
959 Jim: FRX is now at the ask that I first saw after reading your suggestion, 44 scaram(o)uche-6/15/1999
958 John: That's very, very welcome in this thread, and thanks for the pointerscaram(o)uche-6/13/1999
957 Hello .... I realize I maybe on the wrong thread but would very much appreciatJohn McCarthy-6/13/1999
956 Jim: Tried, through one crashed post last night and one this morning, to add 4scaram(o)uche-6/11/1999
955 Could FRX be added to the neuro port.? Forest Labs' Celexa Gaining Ground Jim Oravetz-6/10/1999
954 And what about MLNM? I'm worried that HGSI is largely visiting the 80s....scaram(o)uche-6/10/1999
953 You wouldn't like the rest of Jeff Swartz's views - basically buy the uBiomaven-6/10/1999
952 Chuckle. Yup. (eom) scaram(o)uche-6/10/1999
951 Rick: Frozen in the headlights? biz.yahoo.comMicawber-6/10/1999
950 Walter, I've already answered you, but will give one more answer. Only oneJohn Metcalf-6/9/1999
949 So John, if you really expect CIST to go up to $.6 - $1.25 isn't this a gooWalter Morton-6/9/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News