SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
USRX News -- Just the Facts
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1049 2 0
Emcee:  Michael Burry Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
974 9r, you're in GOOD form today. Love your post. Remember Earl Shibe's Tulvio Durand-2/12/1997
973 Ryan, there are lots of nervous investors who don't like choosing sides betTulvio Durand-2/12/1997
972 Thanks, Derek, for the confirmation of my faith in capitalism <b>and in IngotWeTrust-2/12/1997
971 >>Fancy ISPs will be replace by 14yr old eager beavers who only worry abodrmorgan-2/12/1997
970 No, I don't. We live in a capitalistic society, pal. I remember when JiffyIngotWeTrust-2/12/1997
969 Flattery will getcha everywhere<g>.... Q1: Yes. Q2: Unrelated Irrational IngotWeTrust-2/12/1997
968 Actually not a reply. To anyone: Do you see this new wrinkle of the assorted anfreeus-2/11/1997
967 Someone please answer the following question...I remember when ROK criticized URyan M-2/11/1997
966 Hi ole It's been a while since I read any of your words of wisdom. I lookeDennis J Baltz-2/11/1997
965 Long time, no see...which foxhole have you been in? I see a steep corrective aIngotWeTrust-2/11/1997
964 By Frederick Rose and Evan Ramstad Staff Reporters of The Wall Street Journal David Lawrence-2/11/1997
963 Mary Ann, <<...new technology could come out tomorrow that would change Fred Fahmy-2/10/1997
962 Fred, I sure wish I was as sure about USR as you are. Yes it is well run and wMary Ann Shubaily-2/10/1997
961 Mary Ann, <<Aren't you the least bit worried?>> Nope. That&#Fred Fahmy-2/10/1997
960 No, I am not fed up with USRX. AMAT 6 months ago was a donkey. Look at what hapben luong-2/10/1997
959 Hi, ole 49r, (not related to USRX) Here's a dumb question: which one of yxmas-2/10/1997
958 Fred- Yes, USR looks cheap, but so does COMS. Aren't you the least bit worMary Ann Shubaily-2/10/1997
957 Getting back to the news: US Firm Strikes Deal With Japanese Company SouConstantine Turevsky-2/10/1997
956 Jeffrey, Re: last weeks volumes: ............volume...change....closing trade Dan Good-2/10/1997
955 Hi, Jeff, sorry to be so late getting back to you, but I just now stumbled to mIngotWeTrust-2/10/1997
954 It's still been good for trading. I've scalped some decent change playiJeffery E. Forrest-2/9/1997
953 Mary Ann, <<Had we all been really smart, we'd have bought INTC a feFred Fahmy-2/9/1997
952 Hey-Had we all been really smart, we'd have bought INTC a few months ago anMary Ann Shubaily-2/9/1997
951 Hell, I just want it to break thru to 85!!Jeffery E. Forrest-2/9/1997
950 9'er, I was just looking at a "Weekly" chart. Looks REALLY intereJeffery E. Forrest-2/9/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):