SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol SI Sentiment
10293 141 0 REFR ★★★★★ (Strong Buy)
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9743WEXLER PUTS DOG POUND TO SLEEP by: dollyinvirginia (F/DC burbs) Long-Term SentiN. Dixon-5/28/2003
9742Observations by: jamesdogss 05/28/03 12:51 pm Msg: 144014 of 144032 Because oN. Dixon-5/28/2003
9741Discussion moved to: Subject 53990Bill Wexler-5/28/2003
9740Any good scam stock will have a crazed Yahoo thread and maybe one on SI too to sDale Baker-5/28/2003
9739I stand corrected. <b> BAN HIM!! </b> (or her, or them...). The reRockyBalboa-5/28/2003
9738Normally I'd be ambivalent, but then I remembered that Dixon is a very stronKevin Podsiadlik-5/28/2003
9737Nancy -- The Japan Steel Works early 1990's privacy 'wall' consisteinchingup-5/28/2003
9736Error on Japan Steel Works by: oceanvu2 05/28/03 09:33 am Msg: 143972 of 143980N. Dixon-5/28/2003
9735<i> really despise the idea of censorship, but the amount of clutter theseN. Dixon-5/28/2003
9734I vote no. Why deactivate a publicly available, cost-free shill-o-meter?RockyBalboa-5/28/2003
9733Good idea - I put the ND moron on Ignore long ago but the REFR pissing match stiDale Baker-5/28/2003
9732<b>EVERYONE PLEASE READ</b> As many of you have - no doubt - noticeBill Wexler-5/28/2003
9731Dixon: "So this is a scam?" Why not. After all Nancy, over 11 yearsinchingup-5/27/2003
9730<i>Same old poppycock from the same scam artists</i> So this is a sN. Dixon-5/27/2003
9729Dixon: "So how do you explain the following transpiring?" Same old pinchingup-5/27/2003
9728So how do you explain the following transpiring? Letter to Our Shareholders MN. Dixon-5/27/2003
9727Dale: Take a look at the trades on REFR. They are puny in comparison to any reainchingup-5/27/2003
9726Usual promotional activity, coupled with the fact that just about every garbage Bill Wexler-5/27/2003
9725Re: By the way BILL WEXLER by: Here_To_Taunt_You_Mercilessly 05/27/03 05:52 pm N. Dixon-5/27/2003
9724Re: By the way BILL WEXLER by: dollyinvirginia (F/DC burbs) Long-Term SentimentN. Dixon-5/27/2003
9723Right now, I think someone wants to make sure REFR remains in the Russell indexeKevin Podsiadlik-5/27/2003
9722<I>Any particular reason REFR is getting jammed again? </I> Take yoN. Dixon-5/27/2003
9721Any particular reason REFR is getting jammed again?Dale Baker-5/27/2003
9720Update on the REFR stock fraud My opinion of the company has not changed one biBill Wexler-5/27/2003
9719Taking some ET off after a big run of over 50%.Bill Wexler-5/27/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News