SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9748 Wow! Look at those plate sales. Even the most grizzled bear can't ignore GVTucker-7/28/1998
9747 Wrongway: Do remember these 17 quotes for Prst. Remember 52 Remember 45 Remepaul abramowitz-7/27/1998
9746 Remember that they told us at the shareholder meeting that the technology is asSG-7/27/1998
9745 <i>Agreed, however PRST is starting to look interesting here. We&Olu Emuleomo-7/27/1998
9744 James: You said, "Back in 1993, there were a couple of quarters in which Charles Robinson-7/27/1998
9743 The bulls have been living, and mostly dying, with anecdotal evidence like thisGVTucker-7/27/1998
9742 Reposted without permission, a great article from Jack on the Yahoo thread. &SG-7/27/1998
9741 VLAD, it may be you that will hang their head in shame. You say, "Shame onSG-7/27/1998
9740 JS, I thought the "short squeeze" already occurred years ago when PrVLAD-7/26/1998
9739 Agreed, however PRST is starting to look interesting here. We're basicallyBill Fischofer-7/26/1998
9738 Dear VLAD, I agree with you. I am not trying to kick sand in the face of honesJames C. Shircliff-7/26/1998
9737 JS, There is no need to kick sand in these guy's faces. I suppose they owVLAD-7/24/1998
9736 "...you have an addictive vengeance for trashing this company and any who James C. Shircliff-7/24/1998
9735 James, your foolish assumption of " 27 cents per share. Wow!!!" is baSG-7/24/1998
9734 I have to agree with you Vlad, Neil really spends a lot of time doing research Father E.-7/24/1998
9733 Dear Scott, Let's say PRst announces on their conference call that they havJames C. Shircliff-7/24/1998
9732 James, We shall see on Tues. morning and then at 11:00am on the conference callSG-7/24/1998
9731 Neil, this statement of yours is just not true: (regarding the bears) "...James C. Shircliff-7/24/1998
9730 << Those early "analysts" that made such high early projectionsGVTucker-7/24/1998
9729 NEIL, Wow. What can I say. You probably know more about Presteck's techolVLAD-7/24/1998
9728 MonoDog and VLAD, I appreciate your comments and will not deny that I totally NEIL MACK-7/23/1998
9727 Neil, I have to hand it to you, and to Scott, for your loyalty and your perseveMomo Dog-7/23/1998
9726 NEIL I don't normally post here but I once in a while read through the posVLAD-7/23/1998
9725 On a previous post, I indicated that the Imation Matchprint PEARLhdp proofing sNEIL MACK-7/23/1998
9724 Scott, Your surprise will be that no one will care whatever is said. The earnJames C. Shircliff-7/23/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):