SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WAVX Anyone?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11417 80 0 WAVX
Emcee:  Scott Rafe Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9767 Dear gilderite, Those shorting WAVX cannot be said to have much guts. It'sMarty Lee-2/12/2000
9766 Dear Howard, ".... Historically, why has this company had so much insiderMarty Lee-2/12/2000
9765 Saw a great chart tonight at this site on WAVX. Looks good for sure.Worth a looworkingclassman9-2/11/2000
9764 >>Interesting article on Peter Sprague, WAVX, and The Open Fund<< nigel bates-2/11/2000
9763 I believe that a large part of their compensation is in shares. Last year was Double Dipper-2/11/2000
9762 Historically, why has this company had so much insider selling?Howard R. Krauss, M.D.-2/11/2000
9761 As obvious an attempt this article is at trying to salvage some short's butTony McFadden-2/11/2000
9760 That article had one of the worst descriptions of Wave's technology that I&andrew peterson-2/11/2000
9759 Interesting article on Peter Sprague, WAVX, and The Open Fund... thestreet.comecommerceman-2/11/2000
9758 We have put up with the shorts ever since our re-listing. I don't mind sayigilderite-2/10/2000
9757 Exactly right. When I saw that notice I think we were around $13 and that was tJesse Livermore-2/10/2000
9756 Would that mean that most of the money went into shorting at a much lower priceRichard Roman Kowalski-2/10/2000
9755 David- The restriction applies to all firms. Basically, WAVX has been overshorKevin-2/10/2000
9754 British telecom and WAVX.... Take a look at #2 bt-view.comKlingerg-2/10/2000
9753 Oops! Didn't reference that article. Obtained today for ft.com's InterPaul Schmidt-2/10/2000
9752 Wave gang, Points for debate: Motion 1: Embassy will make it easier to defendPaul Schmidt-2/10/2000
9751 Free-PC.com: Corrrect me if I'm wrong, I seem to recall that these guys wPaul Schmidt-2/10/2000
9750 What are people talking about on the RB board re: a restriction on shorting goiDavid O'Berry-2/10/2000
9749 a slap on the wrist for "Cousin Bob" siliconinvestor.com Ya don'Marty Lee-2/10/2000
9748 Good Boy, fat boy! All this ties in nicely with Retta's recent questions, Marty Lee-2/10/2000
9747 News! biz.yahoo.com Chubbs fat boy-2/10/2000
9746 Just checking in. Looking forward to a "banner" year from Wave. ThoSlateColt-2/10/2000
9745 Thanks Klinger-great link!Retta-2/9/2000
9744 Folks you might want to look at this. I copied this from aws10 (Message# 132943Klingerg-2/9/2000
9743 Retta... If you are truly interested in WAVX then get WAVX 101 from DRM (Guy onKlingerg-2/9/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News