SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Raptor's Den
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
10157 124 0
Emcee:  velociraptor_ Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9832DOW 1998 with bradley overlay: geocities.com damn good correlation...unless onbyhiselo-4/1/2003
9831"inversions" are a non-starter since bradley graphs attempt to map likbyhiselo-4/1/2003
9830its been hot over last year and half but in the interest of back testing haven&byhiselo-4/1/2003
9829I'm looking for the 2nd/3rd also, but I think that may be a low with a contiajtj99-4/1/2003
9828I have a model that is showing a turn 4/3/03, I think that could be a high...theJohn Madarasz-4/1/2003
9827However, the next big Brad is on the 13th, which is a Sunday. There's a tajtj99-4/1/2003
9826Depends on which Bradley version you look at. There are several varieties...helivelociraptor_-4/1/2003
9825i'm always willing to learn. what is the next bradley call: when and what diWin-Lose-Draw-4/1/2003
9824no doubt about it...it's been hotJohn Madarasz-4/1/2003
9823I've generally found them to be pretty accurate plus/minus 1-day, which getsajtj99-4/1/2003
9822a low? how do you figure. the 13th was a low, and this appears to be the next tuNOW-4/1/2003
9821no big deal...i see alot of misinformation being bandied around regarding the cyJohn Madarasz-4/1/2003
9820i don't have any links handy, they get posted around from time to time. iWin-Lose-Draw-4/1/2003
9819Thxs B... I like to give a 2 day allowance on either side of the larger turn daJohn Madarasz-4/1/2003
9818Which studies?..I would be interested in seeing them, I really enjoy the study oJohn Madarasz-4/1/2003
9817sorry, i wasn't clear, i was only referring only to EOD sellof: how bad woulWin-Lose-Draw-4/1/2003
9816grill, it's difficult to tell right now In my informal, unscientific reads bcrafty-4/1/2003
9815the studies i have seen regarding bradley accuracy base success rate on an eventWin-Lose-Draw-4/1/2003
9814John, he probably got it from here in the second paragraph amanita.at How manybcrafty-4/1/2003
9813Just, because. ggg.jjstingray-4/1/2003
9812I'd like to see sub Oct kows personally. "Crazy" may not mean to GrillSgt-4/1/2003
9811what does +/- 4 days mean?John Madarasz-4/1/2003
9810I didn't think that the bradley was directionalJorj X Mckie-4/1/2003
9809because . . . . . ?bcrafty-4/1/2003
9808I think that low tomorrow will be inverted.jjstingray-4/1/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News