SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
E-Mini Pit
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
11288 150 0
Emcee:  the-phoenix Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9838Agree, electronics is a wonderful product, and the rules are know (evrybody shouLouis V. Lambrecht-2/5/2003
9837Slippage is a good thing if you are on the right side of trade :>) I can&#Jack of All Trades-2/5/2003
9836Need some slippage? Full 10pts? ROTFLMAO. This ain't a token of reliability Louis V. Lambrecht-2/5/2003
9835I think 948.00 should stand, personally, unless some glitch in the system causedDoo-2/5/2003
9834854 sounds better than 849.50, but still think their needs to be slippage vs theJack of All Trades-2/5/2003
9833I don't think they should take it down to 849.50 needs to be some slippage oJack of All Trades-2/5/2003
9832Don't have the volume details, but this is a 5 tick per bar chart somebody pDan Duchardt-2/4/2003
9831yea.......that one hurt bigtime...guess it's all part of the learning curve rocklobster-2/4/2003
9830LOL! I remember that. It's been about a year now since that happened, hasn&ajtj99-2/4/2003
9829LOL! Yes indeed. I was joking with him. Indicating it was like a stock that wSE-2/4/2003
9828These contracts are cash-settled, so if his trade were broken he would have beenthe-phoenix-2/4/2003
9827We have to accept the danger, don't we? Crap.SE-2/4/2003
9826Ah, come on! Nobody said gambling on Globex, or any futures market, was going tDoo-2/4/2003
9825OK. The cash market is certainly different than the large contract...and Rock iSE-2/4/2003
9824Well, I said QQQ. I would be very surprised to see it reflected collectively in the-phoenix-2/4/2003
9823Interesting Idea. The contract you traded is now expired though, so your short SE-2/4/2003
9822That's because the NDX didn't spike like the NQ...and they busted the trrocklobster-2/4/2003
9821I show 85.94 spike on the SPY, which should be 856 in my table. Some have also bLouis V. Lambrecht-2/4/2003
9820I might be doing somethign wrong, but I don't see an NDX.X spike on 1/15/200SE-2/4/2003
9819You're right, but SPYke was only to about 868 equivalent.the-phoenix-2/4/2003
9818Yup: Message 16912249the-phoenix-2/4/2003
9817Actually at the time my spike happened, the large NDX contract only moved like frocklobster-2/4/2003
9816January 15, 2002...Doo-2/4/2003
9815This spike also. Look at the SPY. Must be some big boy with a arbitrage 859ish wLouis V. Lambrecht-2/4/2003
9814That is a good thought. I had no idea the cash market mirrored his spike, but tSE-2/4/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News