SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2340 25 0
Emcee:  David Lawrence Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
990 <i>Do you run with banners on as well? Just wondering.</i> Of courRTev-7/29/1999
989 I figure we went from the (always insufferable) MS-DOS (fossil site) to WindowsRTev-7/29/1999
988 No...........Serious? Sarkie-7/29/1999
987 We went from Solairs (Classic Site) to Windows 95 (new site). Cheeky Kid-7/29/1999
986 I'll bet all these hiccups and burps beta has been having, it is probably gSarkie-7/29/1999
985 www.techstocks.com and www.siliconinvestor.com are now the same. The Classic sCheeky Kid-7/29/1999
984 I'm still on the fossil site, that I prefer to call the Classic Site. NotCheeky Kid-7/29/1999
983 <i>www.siliconinvestor.com takes you to the NEW SI</i> Right. But RTev-7/29/1999
982 Michelle, I just tried it, and yes, www.techstocks.com is the fossil site, and Sarkie-7/29/1999
981 I'm a little confused. The members are supposed to go to www.techstocks.coLizzie Tudor-7/29/1999
980 Yeah, they must be working on it. I'm having trouble on both sides. I thiSarkie-7/29/1999
979 Wow, man! w w w . s i l i c o n . i n v e s t o r . c o m &nbsp;(not betaRTev-7/29/1999
978 <i>People are going to think we all drink <g></i> Don'tSarkie-7/29/1999
977 According to those Pictures: images.go2net.com siliconinvestor.com People are Cheeky Kid-7/28/1999
976 It is slow tonight. It was been much better earlier. Now that www.siliconinvestCatLady-7/28/1999
975 This new version is just like what people say about me. It's awfully prettyGary Wisdom-7/28/1999
974 Well, this is weird. I don't see the boxes everyone is talking about in theCatLady-7/28/1999
973 Some of these problems are starting to look a lot like typical dev burnout. ForRTev-7/28/1999
972 <i>Ahhh, I see we just got our messages boxed in.</I> You know, I Lizzie Tudor-7/28/1999
971 Boxes? What boxes? I don't see no steenkin boxes. (Sorry Cheeky) ====== CatLady-7/28/1999
970 Yes; going back to Customize -> Options, verifying that the 'no box'Tony Joines-7/28/1999
969 Posting problems here too. since last nite. Same error as previously mentioneCarole Olkowski-7/28/1999
968 Ahhh, I see we just got our messages boxed in. Edit: I removed the check in &Sarkie-7/28/1999
967 Edit: Never mind I see you have discussed the preview problems already. Just iLizzie Tudor-7/28/1999
966 I must admit it was someone else on the thread who originally suggested "fRTev-7/28/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News