SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Network Appliance
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10934 322 0 NTAP
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9909CC 1 pm ET today at ntap.comJacob Snyder-2/12/2002
9908Account Control. The usual suspects: IBM, Sun, HP, EMC. You go to spec out a nriposte-2/12/2002
9907EMC we'll hear from tomorrow, but talking way out of line . . . If I can seShort A. Few-2/12/2002
9906re "account control" owners: If any company should have been able to Jacob Snyder-2/11/2002
9905re: Not a good year to talk accounting issues!! I think it's an excellent yJacob Snyder-2/11/2002
9904Steve, would appreciate knowing your thoughts on (ID of) "account control&qShort A. Few-2/11/2002
9903This isn't aimed at NTAP, but since you brought it up on this thread: Not oSelectric II-2/11/2002
9902These days, charges are charges, one-time or not. ~SB~SecularBull-2/11/2002
9901Barriers to Entry Ahhh...there's the rub. There are many different types oriposte-2/11/2002
9900I'm very encouraged that everyone seems to be targetting storage. It tells mJacob Snyder-2/11/2002
9899==OT== >> I guess though that everything can be justified if you try hardThe Gambler-2/11/2002
9898>>If we don't reach a bit, all we'll do is restate the obvious andJakeStraw-2/11/2002
9897>> I think you're reaching a bit if you compare NTAP to CSCO, MSFT &amUncle Frank-2/11/2002
9896>>Check their fv for bellwethers like csco, msft, intc I think you'reJakeStraw-2/11/2002
9895>> The stock currently trades 58% higher than Morningstar's fair valueUncle Frank-2/11/2002
9894>>hey show NTAP making 11 cents in Jan 01, 2 cents in April 01, 1 cent in JakeStraw-2/11/2002
9893Yeah, I'm looking at operating numbers sans one time charges. They show NTAElroy-2/11/2002
9892Red Looks like all the bottom line numbers are in brackets...which indicates a riposte-2/11/2002
9891>>They never went into the red as far as I can recall. I suggest you lookJakeStraw-2/11/2002
9890<i>Data-storage company Network Appliances NTAP will likely report a decenElroy-2/11/2002
9889Data-storage company Network Appliances NTAP will likely report a decent quarterJakeStraw-2/11/2002
9888** Sun Rolls Out Products To Fill Storage Gap Story from InformationWeek on Sunriposte-2/7/2002
9887Sun CEO sees profit, storage push <i><b> Sun CEO sees profit, storriposte-2/6/2002
9886Valuation JS - totally agreed. I don't know why they're valued so highriposte-2/5/2002
9885SS, The thing that bothers (and has been bothering) me is knowing all the uncertJakeStraw-2/5/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):