SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts
An SI Board Since April 2020
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
100049 224 0 BRKA
Emcee:  ajtj99 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
99092I can say with absolute certainty that there is no way for Trump to skim tariff ajtj992February 21
99091The tariff situation makes sense if you only stop to think what the tariffs are TigerPaw4February 21
99090Well, now he's so mad, he hiked global tariffs to 15%, the statutory max: tajtj99-February 21
99089I enjoy the War on Drugs -- from time to timeyard_man-February 21
99088Climate Prediction Center 8-14 Day Outlook says nearly everyone in the Lower 48 ajtj99-February 20
99087Tweet's BORR has a daily bearish compression pattern on the full stochs. Theajtj99-February 20
99086From Wikipedia: "In 1935, the Newfoundland Commission of Government adoptecandsrr-February 20
99085Yeah, saw that. It would be hard to believe he was in the dark about it even thoajtj99-February 20
99084Lutnick’s firm went ahead and bought rights to get back tariffs!sandeep-February 20
99083If this passes then we will all be in sync with Newfoundland. US and Newfies aedward miller1February 20
99082Gold is moving up to test the $5,111 level. It looks like it could surpass that ajtj99-February 20
99081I wouldn't put it past them, but courts would likely rule it illegal and strajtj99-February 20
99080It looks like the Section 122 tariffs will expire after 150-days. Congress has najtj99-February 20
99079But if you let it lapse and start a new one? Theoretically it is not an extensiosandeep-February 20
99078Section 122 Tariffs clarified: But any Section 122 tariffs he imposes may onlyajtj99-February 20
99077We won't know until it is tried. With all the Federalists on the Supreme Couajtj99-February 20
99076They had a flat 10% baseline for the April 7 tariffs. They probably just wanted ajtj99-February 20
99075I bet the law doesn’t say that it can’t be re-started with a 1 day gap.sandeep-February 20
99074That’s what I said. But why 10% when 15% can be done?sandeep-February 20
99073Still long and strong here.Clam digger-February 20
99072I was mistaken on that reply. Check my most recent reply.ajtj99-February 20
99071Trump said he would impose a new 10 percent universal tariff under Section 122 ajtj991February 20
99070Businesses just love it when they hear someone say this: Trump, calling the rulajtj991February 20
99069It is meaningless. It has no legal basis in law. It was just thrown out to win tajtj99-February 20
99068Supreme Court decision sets up battle over tariff refunds: What to know thehillajtj99-February 20
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News