SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Essex Resource Corporation Up Over 33%! (T.ESX)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1394 12 0 ESX
Emcee:  Rob Ady Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
994 Sir Robert, I doubt anyone could give this deal either a thumbs up or thumbs dokidl-7/21/1998
993 Kevin: Yep, got it. Thanks. Do you get S. Khanna's "The Resource IndStew-7/21/1998
992 The market sure doesn't seem to be impressed....Has anyone out there been aArchangel-7/21/1998
991 New Business, news disclaimer FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: Eskfdkfd-7/21/1998
990 Thank you for that analysis. It's much appreciated. Stew-7/20/1998
989 there will be a lot of shrs out - 40MM and then some more I assume to get thingrdww-7/20/1998
988 Will wait for S. Khanna's review before guessing. Stew-7/20/1998
987 Trading is back on. Looks like good news for the longer term. Any predictionsNesbbria-7/20/1998
986 NEWS RELEASE TRANSMITTED BY CANADIAN CORPORATE NEWS FOR: ESSEX RESOURSure-7/20/1998
985 Thanks Ken. I saw it. Any opinion? Stew-7/20/1998
984 1 11:52 T *Essex To Buy Stake In Spain Project For About C$17M 2 11:5Moneysmith-7/20/1998
983 Are we halted or not? Conflicting reports from Stockwatch. I assume we'reStew-7/20/1998
982 This thread is very active this morning. Wouldn't it be nice if the tradinDavid Fedorkiw-7/20/1998
981 To the bunch of you, a little tense or what? If you jump all over each other juNesbbria-7/20/1998
980 <<Sudhir, thanks for explaining your previous post. Just wish you would hClark Kent-7/20/1998
979 Sudhir, thanks for explaining your previous post. Just wish you would have donekidl-7/20/1998
978 None of us who follow SI for serious purposes likes unfounded comment & preStew-7/20/1998
977 Sorry Frank, I didn't know this was a popularity contest. I will henceforthkidl-7/20/1998
976 kidl, I was responding directly to the following post from Sure. "ActualSudhir Khanna-7/20/1998
975 If you subscribed to Sudhir Khanna's "The Resource Indicator", anStew-7/20/1998
974 Are you the self anointed classroom monitor of every thread you jabber on in? OFrank-7/20/1998
973 So, what do you think will happen next week? This company, I believe is noted David Fedorkiw-7/20/1998
972 He would be asked nicer if he would substantiate his claims. The rest is hype akidl-7/20/1998
971 This is interesting. Sudhir writes a newsletter, to which I subscribe, and in wDavid Fedorkiw-7/19/1998
970 I HATE THESE KIND OF POSTS!!!!!!!!!! Substantiate what you are saying or get lkidl-7/19/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News