SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Copper Fox
An SI Board Since February 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10654 112 0 CUU
Emcee:  louel Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9954Louel, I've thought about slurries too, especially given the Galore scenarimudguy-3/16/2016
9953" I feel david m wasnt comfortable with direction of the company " louel23/16/2016
9952I agree with you louel. I feel david m wasnt comfortable with direction of the Underhill69-3/15/2016
9951The term weak hands was made up by professionals to encourage others to hold whlouel43/15/2016
9950david macdonald had weak hands and sold his shares for whatever reason, but in hUnderhill69-3/15/2016
9949Sorry, this is a long one. Much of the resource change can be attributed to amudguy83/14/2016
9948I did a comparison with the resource numbers last year to see what had happened explorationguy13/14/2016
9947Still with all the technical blips over the past 18 months or so this could pop Hog Head13/14/2016
9946Good posts today gents. I agree with your analysis on Elmer's ability (or ldsikorsk13/14/2016
9945That swing trade has worked many times, I have done about 10 of those in the pasmudguy23/14/2016
9944As Brundal said Mac D left for a reason But before him there were others They splouel33/14/2016
9943brundall and al. Looking to see what would be our best option moving forward. FTap66-3/14/2016
9942Actually, I have to revise my previous post and remove Elmer from the list of pebrundall23/14/2016
9941David M relied on the same information as we all did....a stellar pre-feasibilitbrundall63/14/2016
9940What's your take on David MacDonald's purchases? How do we explain his Tap6613/14/2016
9939He was a brilliant communicator. In some ways, I have always thought that he wamudguy33/13/2016
9938I think a lot of people caught up in Vette mania. He sounded convincing, A louel53/13/2016
9937Golfeyeti should launch a class action against vette and his handler for the finspecboy201213/13/2016
9936Here is a tool which tells you how much less your investment is worth just due louel53/12/2016
9935Pounds in the ground is a bit of a mining myth, much like the notional concept omudguy53/12/2016
9934Pounds in the ground is great and all, but time is expensive. The longer this gHog Head53/11/2016
9933The bottom line is that the pounds are still in the ground and even at this datecpac13/11/2016
9932I too have worried about this type of scenario where EE calls it quits because bmahzman213/11/2016
9931That scenario is basically priced for us by the market: current market cap. Thmudguy13/11/2016
9930I wonder how many of the existing retail shareholders have thought of the followexplorationguy43/11/2016
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News