SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF Portfolio
An SI Board Since August 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1073 31 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
998 Janssen Pharm announces the withdrawal of prescription antihistamine HISMANAL fLLCF-6/21/1999
997 Rick: Thanks for your prompt response. I think there is a pulse. IMHO, at underBulbaMan-6/21/1999
996 Bulba: Haven't looked at them closely since Iterex Pharm. modified the magscaram(o)uche-6/21/1999
995 Richard (or anyone else): Any thoughts on MAGN? Here's a link to my post onBulbaMan-6/21/1999
994 Harold, <i>The "Engstrom" portfolio... it has a nice ring to iBiomaven-6/20/1999
993 Larry, Re SUPG: I still own some shares that have done nicely. I think NipenBiomaven-6/20/1999
992 Larry: SUPG..... I'll defer to Peter. They've shown that they can gscaram(o)uche-6/20/1999
991 Richard....I have continued to sit on my biotechs, being pleasantly surprised bLarry Liebman-6/20/1999
990 < I'm up 20% YTD, but that is meaningless in nanocap land, where both thLLCF-6/19/1999
989 <I've been making my calls very public since Spring '95, and I deserLLCF-6/19/1999
988 You've earned my respect--you did not have it initially, but I suspect thatMike McFarland-6/19/1999
987 >> Ideally you would want to know why each person does well, and wscaram(o)uche-6/19/1999
986 Ideally you would want to know why each person does well, and when they outperMike McFarland-6/19/1999
985 On second thought..... I stopped tending the portfolio, in part, because I donscaram(o)uche-6/19/1999
984 OK, given the recent focus, I'm actually going to get it done this weekend.scaram(o)uche-6/18/1999
983 Thanks again, PB. I didn't mean to suggest you were nit-picking; in fact,John Metcalf-6/18/1999
982 OK, to atone for my nit picking, I am posting this info (which I will try to upPseudo Biologist-6/18/1999
981 Thanks, PB. To get an apples vs. apples comparison, AMEX Biotech gained 23% frJohn Metcalf-6/18/1999
980 Thanks for the clarification on 1-year vs. year-to-date; I missed that. These Pseudo Biologist-6/18/1999
979 "Fidelity's shareholders paid 1.5% in expenses last year; Franklin'scaram(o)uche-6/18/1999
978 PB: I am in complete agreement with what you're trying to say.... we arescaram(o)uche-6/18/1999
977 One more time, and sorry if this bothers anyone; regarding <<I also meantPseudo Biologist-6/18/1999
976 ROTFLMAO! The "Engstrom" portfolio... it has a nice ring to it! TheHarold Engstrom-6/18/1999
975 <how do you lose 8%? > You "create" the lows with your sales [LLCF-6/18/1999
974 For the fund managers who are lurking out there..... why do you short good coscaram(o)uche-6/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News