SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Buy Berkshire instead of Vanguard S&P (BRKA)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
313 24 0 BRK.A
Emcee:  Patsy Collins Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
313<i>if you have not book your annual meeting with Warren flight already, itJurgis Bekepuris-4/6/2010
312Been over a year since I last invested in BRK and today maybe a good time near $Patsy Collins-4/6/2010
311Yes. You make a good point. We were all duped by trusting a fragile financialappro-3/11/2009
310The main problem with holding BRK A or B now is liquidity. If an institutional Patsy Collins-3/6/2009
309Patsy, I agree. No one knows how low this will go. Or for how many years. But appro-3/6/2009
308BRKA, under 75k, although not down as much as other financials, is not low enougPatsy Collins-3/2/2009
307Buffett maybe the complete opposite of this Madoff character. I must admit that Patsy Collins-1/12/2009
306Yes, Patsy, that really is true. He has the right approach to investing and makappro-1/12/2009
305Forget about having Buffett's wealth. Wouldn't it be nice to just think Patsy Collins21/8/2009
304Buffett hopes to see the market plunge a couple more times....before he dies. Tappro-1/2/2009
303These are scary times. Anything is a possibility. Look at how many Madoff managPatsy Collins212/24/2008
302I don't think we have to worry about Goldman going under. Stranger things hpaulnewmanhero-12/16/2008
301True, but if Goldman goes under, the 10% dividend is not a legal obligation.Patsy Collins111/17/2008
300He didn't lose 40% because he bought preferred stock with a 10% dividend. ThMoominoid-11/17/2008
299Thanks Patsy.paulnewmanhero-11/14/2008
298Good advice. I agree we all in another learning experience. I trust Warren &amappro-11/14/2008
297None of us, including Warren have experienced this latest economic crisis. It haPatsy Collins-11/13/2008
296I am back in as of a few months ago for a 15% haircut. Have been vacillating abappro-11/13/2008
295I still hold it and while it has outperformed peers this year, I would not add. Patsy Collins-11/13/2008
294So what do you think of BRKa now?paulnewmanhero-11/12/2008
293BRK on the list of mega cap financials that have held in 2008. BRK/a (I'm sPatsy Collins19/27/2008
292Berkshire is coming back strong as always....paulnewmanhero-9/27/2008
291I agree.appro-5/16/2008
290You are welcome. I left the party way too early, but I will be back.appro-5/16/2008
289That 0.22 beta makes sense in a bear market and BRK/A has maintained a 0.15 to aPatsy Collins-5/14/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News