SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc.
An SI Board Since January 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
37 11 0 APNT
Emcee:  mact Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
37What's the deal with the two NNPP boards? I think we need to shut down one Ron Dior-3/6/2007
36More a Bulldog than a Bull!donpat-2/22/2007
35You sound bitter DP. I thought you were a NNPP Bull? Ron Dior-2/21/2007
34I don't think he stepped down - he was put down - for not delivering. Burckdonpat-6/24/2006
33Does anyone have a comment about the step-down of Mr. Eller from the position ofSavant-6/24/2006
32If anyone wants some really good information on random nanotech companies and inkoaray-6/1/2006
31Nano-Proprietary, Inc. And Mitsui &Amp; Co. Ltd Announce Strategic Alliance donpat-5/18/2006
30Nice movement today. up .27 so far with good volume. Much more news coming. RRon Dior-2/24/2006
29Nano-Proprietary, Inc. to Receive $1 Million for Biological and Chemical Air PurRon Dior-1/27/2006
28For 'nanobio' you only need to know one name - NanoViricides - NNVC. indonpat-1/12/2006
27Right now our NNPP is under "misc.technology" and that is much too larAlfred W. Post-1/12/2006
26Nano is such a wide and growing field that I think it is best to narrow it down donpat-1/11/2006
25There are already 2 boards on SI: Nanotech Stocks to Watch NanotechnologyRikRichter-1/11/2006
24Here I am again with a suggestion: Nanotechnology becoming ever more important, Alfred W. Post-1/11/2006
23I "discovered" Starpharma (SPHRY) in the field of nanotechnology and eAlfred W. Post-1/11/2006
22I like both! Both are stock price increasers. We can't lose as I see it.donpat-1/10/2006
21The way you put it No. 2 is more likely and bad for us who bought the sock. Am IAlfred W. Post-1/10/2006
20CC notes: 1) An exclusive (likely) with one of two fortune 100 is currently undedonpat-12/14/2005
19<b>Ron, if I got it right, what you are saying is: wait and see.</b>Ron Dior-11/25/2005
18Ron, if I got it right, what you are saying is: wait and see. FredAlfred W. Post-11/21/2005
17Alfred, I have not heard anything on this since it went in suit. Without actuaRon Dior-11/20/2005
16Ron, as a consequence of this suite is there more in it than a "cease and dAlfred W. Post-11/19/2005
15Nano-Proprietary, Inc. to Exhibit Breakthrough Technologies to European Market Ddonpat-8/31/2005
14biz.yahoo.com Nano-Proprietary Files Declaratory Judgment Action Against Canon TRon Dior-4/12/2005
13Stock is moving nicely last several weeks. Nano-Proprietary, Inc. to Appear on Ron Dior-4/10/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):