JET--Jetronic--A Real "Sleeper" | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
JET--Jetronic--A Real "Sleeper"

An SI Board Since September 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
8	1	0	JET

Emcee: Bill Driscoll	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

It's not often you can find a real company with annual, growing revenues of $20-$25 million, only 3.6 million shares, increasing earnings (past 4 qtrs of $0.17/share) trading for $1.00! Even better, its listed on the AMEX where there are no manipulating NASDAQ market makers!
JET does not have a sexy business, but a steady one, making electronic power conversion equipment for heavy industry (Catepillar accounts for big chunk of sales). Balance sheet not great but not a liability. This is truely in the land of lost & forgotten stocks. IMO, I'm not suggesting this should be a $10 stock, but $2-$3 is a fair valuation.

Opinions?

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
8	Company/Stock has been nothing but a real dump. No leadership in the area of P	Wibble	-	4/2/1999
7	Stock has been in a downward trend over past 6 to 9 months. Any word we will h	Wibble	-	12/7/1998
6	Found out through edgar that JET filed a NT 10-K (late again-you called it) on	Wibble	-	5/7/1998
5	They are technically late with the 10-K filing. Unfortunately, they have a his	Bill Driscoll	-	5/7/1998
4	What is up with this stock. No news or press releases since 12/15/97. I am call	Wibble	-	5/6/1998
3	I saw the report in the WSJ. Pretty impressive, hopefully people will think it	Paul Andrews	-	12/17/1997
2	WOW! Look at 3rd Qtr EPS of $0.19. Not too shabby for a $1.25 stock!	Bill Driscoll	-	12/15/1997
1	I think the problem with this stock is right their in what you wrote. Catepill	Paul Andrews	-	9/17/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):