Petition to Reinstate Jane J. Jackson | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Petition to Reinstate Jane J. Jackson

An SI Board Since August 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
75	1	0

Emcee: Forest Gump	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

I am starting this Coffee Shop thread to solicit signatures (yeah/nay) from the SI community for the reinstatement of one of our most loved and hated former members, Jane J. Jackson.

Jane was (is) a bad girl and got herself permanently suspended from SI for what she claims was bad taste. She had the bad taste to give certain posters the time of day and a lot of lip that broke SI rules.
Is that really why? Who knows? Who cares?

Triple J has been spotted on the Yahoo boards. Let's bring her in from the cold. She has been punished long enough.

Give us your thoughts and your votes and let the SI Gods decide her fate.

FREE JANE

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
75	We want Jane, we want Jane, We want Jane. I hope that is sufficient. Bring he	Double Dipper	-	5/1/1999
74	Another vote in: Bring back Jane!	Field	-	9/1/1998
73	o.k........I do miss her.......and I don't care if she wears a bikini or no	GENE JEEP	-	8/28/1998
72	Jane who? Oh yeah, that Jane! Hi Triple J, remember we have a lunch date some	Russell Gish	-	8/28/1998
71	Free Jane! Free Jane! Free Jane! Free Jane! Free Jane! Free Jane! <i>F	WHL	-	8/28/1998
70	Free Jane She has paid her debt to society.	Djeff	-	8/27/1998
69	Jane is great !!! She makes the day brighter, I cant believe they kicked her of	marianna	-	8/27/1998
68	I vote yes ...bring jane back! JC	JCinTC	-	8/26/1998
67	Unless she did something worse than a "cigar dooleelllapop" near the	Joe Copia	-	8/26/1998
66	I vote yes! <B>B R I N G __ J A N E __ B A C K !</B> SI is dimini	Coz	-	8/26/1998
65	If anybody has an interest.....I got this PM from SIbob.....either he follows m	Shoot1st	-	8/26/1998
64	Well said....bot....I think you spelled "incockneedo" wrong. Shoot	Shoot1st	-	8/26/1998
63	To All, I just found this thread when I reviewed the "Hot Topics" li	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/26/1998
62	ah yes...........the infamous jane j. jackson......... every investors fantasy	Jeff	-	8/26/1998
61	I sure don't belong here making a vote. But my only oobservation is that ev	dacoola	-	8/25/1998
60	Sure ---bring her back. But is she for real? Take a chance.	Stockbull	-	8/25/1998
59	I read the last posts she made some time ago, don't know if they are still	lightfoot	-	8/25/1998
58	<<<My Vote is Yes, A Permanent Ban is too extreme!! >>> Too	Little Engine	-	8/25/1998
57	My Vote is Yes, A Permanent Ban is too extreme!! And in response to Mark3000 w	lightfoot	-	8/25/1998
56	Janie's got my vote too! Poet	Poet	-	8/25/1998
55	PLEASE RE-INSTATE JANE J. JACKSON NOW! Byron C. Glenn M.D.	Secret_Agent_Man	-	8/25/1998
54	I want the Princess of California back.	Mark Duper	-	8/25/1998
53	It's time to call in Ken Starr. No perjury allowed on SI, ever. <g>	Raptech	-	8/25/1998
52	TLC, thanks. Without Jane's insight, I would not have known how big Texaco	Little Engine	-	8/25/1998
51	I vote no. dont write checks with your mouth that you cant cash with your butt	Mark3000	-	8/25/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):