Terms of Use Violators Hall of Fame | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Terms of Use Violators Hall of Fame

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
23	3	0

Emcee: Don Pueblo	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Anyone on SI just annoy you to the point of tears by posting nonsense that graphically displays their bad intentions?

Ever get the feeling that some fool is posting for the sole purpose of trying to pick a fight...and won't give up?

Who needs these boneheads on SI? Violations are a judgement call by the SI Overlords, but violations are violations, all the same. If you find a post objectionable or a violation of your rights, then it might be a violation of the Terms of Use.

Nominees are welcome to claim they have the right to remain offensive to the general public.

From the SI Terms of Use:

B. You agree not to use the service for illegal purposes or for the transmission of material that is unlawful, harassing, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, abusive, threatening, harmful, vulgar, obscene, tortious, improper or otherwise objectionable, or that infringes or may infringe the intellectual property or other rights of another.

house.gov

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
23	Dood, so many years gone by Seems like I let the TOU violations fly out the wind	AugustWest	-	11/13/2002
22	Everyone been good lately?	AugustWest	-	6/30/2001
21	Out of the night When the full moon is bright Comes a horseman known as Bob...	Don Pueblo	-	5/23/1999
20	Here's a good one: Message 9704553 Duly reported to the powers that be, D	Doug R	-	5/23/1999
19	I just joined last Sunday, but I have already noticed... 1. A surfeit of real	Herc	-	2/14/1999
18	Evil Emile doesn't violate the terms of use; he <i>is</i> a vio	Edwarda	-	2/12/1999
17	He's not worthy, either. I'm looking for a real, sneaky, hype-monger t	Dayuhan	-	2/9/1999
16	But Emile isn't publicly traded. <VBG> ______________________________	Bill Ulrich	-	2/9/1999
15	Well, maybe... but those crimes are more overexposed than a strip of Tri-X in a	Dayuhan	-	2/9/1999
14	LoL! "Get Shorty"—how appropriate. Mikey Slyver (AZNT CEO) as Ray	Bill Ulrich	-	2/8/1999
13	I'm a fan of Elmore Leonard. Wouldn't he have fun with the AZNT cast o	PatiBob	-	2/8/1999
12	Bob's slapped Rico and Anti around, a bit. Given the tremendous thread volu	Bill Ulrich	-	2/8/1999
11	<i>......Spidey et. al. provide maximum entertainment value, albeit in a	PatiBob	-	2/8/1999
10	Hey there! Exposing crims is "God's work", as Auric would say. As	Bill Ulrich	-	2/8/1999
9	It should be. <g> PB	PatiBob	-	2/8/1999
8	Humbly report, TLC, now a moment for the Hall of Fame Violators of the 1.3 kin	Josef Svejk	-	2/8/1999
7	It could be argued that the entire AZNT thread is an insult to the human race,	Dayuhan	-	2/7/1999
6	Is interminable whining a violation of the terms of use?	Dayuhan	-	2/7/1999
5	Evil Emile! How did I know he'd be nominee no. 1? How fitting! But don&#	Edwarda	-	2/7/1999
4	I've got a good one, no posts are necessary as everyone knows her, y<i&	PatiBob	-	2/6/1999
3	I guess so! Let's see if he'll drop by to complain about his unjust tre	Don Pueblo	-	2/6/1999
2	TLC, You've set the bar at the ultimate pinnacle. Any further nominees wil	David Lawrence	-	2/6/1999
1	My first nomination: Emile Vidrine! Freedom of Religion? Not with Emile, sorry,	Don Pueblo	-	2/6/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):