SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Worst Managements of Publicly Traded Companies
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
27 3 0
Emcee:  Ben Wa Type:  Unmoderated
Here is where we assemble the list of company managements who have screwed shareholders while making themselves wealthy. Unfortunately, there are many people who qualify to be included in this category. Deeds that enable one to qualify include: bonuses paid to top managements upon change in control of the company, increasing salary or reducing the strike price on stock options while company fundamentals and/or the stock price deteriorates, nepotism - the hiring of poorly qualified relatives to help run the firm in lieu of more highly qualified non-related people, those who put out variations of the same meaningless press release over and over. No doubt, SI'ers will think of additional deeds that will vault the managements of companies into this most heralded club. We might think of establishing a tier, with points being assigned for various misdeeds. Possibly at the end of each fiscal quarter or calendar year, we can bestow awards on those whose very presence within a company simply defines sleaze and betrayal.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
27wavcentral.comJosef Svejk-5/15/1999
26 well maybe that's all noise. Ben Wa-5/15/1999
25 Revenue decreased. Decline result of focus of sales attention. Sales to signifiJosef Svejk-5/15/1999
24 So...why is that bad? Ben Wa-5/15/1999
23 It looks like this company manages their debt like some people I know: get a lohunchback-5/15/1999
22sec.yahoo.comJosef Svejk-5/14/1999
21 I'm interested in this thread, even though few answer. Can you be descripthunchback-5/14/1999
20 AURA sucks too. Did you sell your BICO? If not, I'll bet you wish you hadJoe Lyddon-5/14/1999
19 They have only been in business for 17 years and you expect them to have a proJoe Master-5/9/1999
18 Sorry. I wouldn't dare to guess how high this would go. If enough people hunchback-4/30/1999
17 I bought Bico last week at $ 0.05. It is now $ 0.22. Should I sell soon, or dJonathan S. Feingold-4/30/1999
16 Isn't it the most incredible thing? I've watched off and on for over Shoot1st-4/30/1999
15 I agree with the lottery ticket idea. Thanks, I was trying to decide what to dhunchback-4/30/1999
14 COuld not have said it better. YOu made a profit........????????? I'd caShoot1st-4/30/1999
13 BICO No one writes here anymore, so I will. This company really makes me laughunchback-4/30/1999
12cancom.netJosef Svejk-4/7/1999
11 WURST CASE SCENARIO RESULTS IN 5-KM-LONG SAUSAGE Laasdorf, Germany (dpa) - It Sir Auric Goldfinger-4/7/1999
10 I figure that if BICO could take over the free world and distribute it equally Shoot1st-4/2/1999
9 BICO was the least expensive education I ever received. I still follow their hunchback-4/2/1999
8 Copytele: self enrichment through option sales. No verifable product. Sir Auric Goldfinger-3/31/1999
7 BICO may well have been the original hype-a-rama. Eight years ago, give or takeShoot1st-3/31/1999
6 Actually, I was hoping for a description of the behavior that makes managementsBen Wa-3/31/1999
5 P.S. techstocks.comJosef Svejk-3/31/1999
4 Just a wild guess. I was hoping you would find favor with my choice. Shootie Shoot1st-3/31/1999
3 how sweet Ben Wa-3/31/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):