SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
196953 1035 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
This thread has a long history of collegial discussion of Qualcomm and its place in the wireless industry. While disagreements are fierce, we have been able to keep the discussion focused and generally civil. These rules are intended to try and continue those traditions.

This is a discussion forum, not a chat room. These rules have been in place since '01 and have served us well, however I am tacking on a new explicit rule concerning political discussions.

RULES

First and foremost, use common sense when posting. We have a long history to draw on and most should have a good idea as to what is considered on-topic and times when there might be a small amount of leeway. That leeway does not apply to politics.

No political rants/slams or even value judgments. The political discussion which is allowed is the impact of specific policy proposals on Qualcomm. For example, the IMPACT of changes to the H1B visa program is fair game, but I do not want discussions on whether increased immigration is a good or bad policy idea.

No cheerleading, stock quotes, or discussions of short-term price movements or your own holdings.

No off topic posts.

No flaming.

Please use discretion when linking or posting articles that are only marginally related to Qualcomm.

Please ignore IQ challenged posters.

Consider PM's when making posts of little value to the larger thread.

.............................................................................

Posts that violate the above rules will be met with a warning and the 2nd offense will earn a ban of varying length. Unfortunately, I know it is impossible to make everybody happy, but I believe that the above rules will allow us to continue the valuable types of discussions that we have had for so long on this thread.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19695310 High-Yielding Dividend Stocks to Buy for 2026 By Lawrence C. Strauss Updated Bill Wolf1an hour ago
196952Uneconomic and an organizational distraction for sure. For color, Samsung is reWildbiftek2yesterday
196951Point is, mdtk, Huawei, Samsung all managed to design, certify and deploy their Qurious-yesterday
196950Fighting FTC rulings is usually pretty easy because they’re rarely right.freefromwires-yesterday
196949Let's look at the modems - Mediatek has them - but not for premium tier.... Optntrdr1999-yesterday
196948Sorry, meant to say "viable" 5G modem. The settlement was Cook's tQurious-yesterday
196947OT: Surveillance Pricing share.google Instacart going this route was on CNN thwaitwatchwander-yesterday
196946AAPL had sourced a modem from Intel - that was furiously substandard - they wereOptntrdr19992yesterday
196945Jim, I had assumed you were paying for Copilot. I spread my use around, am occasA.J. Mullen-yesterday
196944Worse than direct expenses, Cook's spiteful disclosure of the BCPA damaged QQurious-yesterday
196943Continue to source what from Intel? Intel did not have, and was unlikely to haveQurious-yesterday
196942The beef I had with the Apple settlement is that it barely recovered the cost ofwaitwatchwander2yesterday
196941wasnt that the one that was overturned - because the FTC took on face value everOptntrdr1999-yesterday
196940If i remember correctly the FTC vase had just wrapped up its hearing and the rulchiilingInSd1yesterday
196939AJ, re ; Copilot / LLMs ............................................ As an examJim Mullens-yesterday
196938Not only that, all the real news is heading behind paywalls. However, one will waitwatchwander-yesterday
196937Big Businesses Are Cashing In on Trump’s Tax Cuts Corporate tax revenue has quiBill Wolf1yesterday
196936I see that as a different problem: getting the general public to accept a falsehA.J. Mullen-yesterday
196935Since money is the answer to most questions posited, I agree they are trying to voop-yesterday
196934Kind of like why patent counting, rather than quality, is deceptive.JeffreyHF7yesterday
196933it's worse than that. You can just spend marketing dollars to flood the narrengineer2yesterday
196932 BROBDINGNAGIAN Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster Swift's book fireJim Mullens1yesterday
196931Bill / AJ, re: (Copilot QA) on - WSJ/ Ms Stern’s -AI Gadgets Are Bad Right Now Jim Mullens1yesterday
196930It won't be long before an AI of AI's comes along. That should even outwaitwatchwander1yesterday
196929Whether more engagement follows from pleasing or enraging the user could be deteA.J. Mullen-yesterday
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News