SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
FDA THRESHOLD: LOWER-RISK BIOTECH INVESTING
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
75 8 0 BTK.X
Emcee:  opalapril Type:  Unmoderated
In the wake of several spectacular P-3 experimental drug failures, some investors (me, for example) have concluded there is little difference between rank gambling and investing in thinly-capitalized biotechnology companies with nothing but a good story and a literate PR department. Past and present FDA practice compels such entites to endure years of expensive P-1, P-2, and P-3 tests, all the while enabling them to dilute shareholder value with toxic convertibles, secondary issues, and magnanimous options for executives, board members, and their buddies. This thread is intended to help minimize by risk by limiting discussion to companies with promising compounds or medical devices that are on the very threshhold of FDA approval.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
75Opal, Within moments of finishing my previous post I came up with a new idea foEdscharp-6/5/2004
74Opal, Don't know if you're still around, but I've concluded that thEdscharp-6/4/2004
73Ed, After the market close today, BTRN announced a shelf registration for 5M shaArthur Radley-12/10/2001
72Tex, I checked BTRN's news. I hate to be overly cynical, but BTRN sounds eEdscharp-12/10/2001
71Ed, Let me put it this way! At a certain location, it apparently is deep enough Arthur Radley-12/10/2001
70So Tex, How deep goes your brazos? Are they in P3 trials yet? ;- )Edscharp-12/10/2001
69Ed, You certainly can't fault your approaching to investing in biotechs...byArthur Radley-12/10/2001
68Tex, Thanks for the tip on BTRN, but I'm not so sure I agree with you. FirEdscharp-12/9/2001
67Ed, IMO the way to play MEDI is through BTRN. I expect good news on their psoriaArthur Radley-12/9/2001
66Opal, Good point. Nonetheless, I think I'm going to stick to my strategy oEdscharp-12/7/2001
65Actually, I think it is more than coincidence. Didn't the same thing happen opalapril-12/6/2001
64Hi Opal, We haven't talked in a long while. Hope you are well. I think I sEdscharp-12/6/2001
63<i>"it is raining cats and dogs here. What would you call that if youopalapril-1/25/2001
62Dear Mr. Opala Pril, it is raining cats and dogs here. What would you call thataknahow-1/24/2001
61Dear Mr. Opala Pril, By now I am sure you have seen that XOMA was the second beaknahow-1/1/2001
60Parking Biotech Industry to Benefit From New Drugs Next Year: Outlook 12/27/200opalapril-1/1/2001
59VYSI biz.yahoo.com Thursday November 30, 8:30 am Eastern Time Press Release SOopalapril-12/1/2000
58 FDA Action Letter Received in Advance of Ten-Month Review Period biz.yahoo.comopalapril-5/18/2000
57 Texas Biotech - July FDA action expected. Message 13711832opalapril-5/15/2000
56 I'd be careful. BSDM's press release is a lot rosier than Lancet'sopalapril-3/31/2000
55 Success of BSD-2000 as lead article in The Lancet ****************************Micro-Selector-3/31/2000
54 ALOHA HERE IS ONE FOR YOU AVNR YEAR AFTER YEAR FDA MORE TEST MORE TEST WILL HAwilliam prideaux-2/25/2000
53 TXB Texas Biotech anticlotting drug approvable HOUSTON, Feb 22 (Reuters) - Topalapril-2/22/2000
52Message 12862379opalapril-2/16/2000
51Message 12558812opalapril-2/16/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):