SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Revision History For: The Donkey's Inn

15 Mar 2005 09:43 AM
14 Jan 2005 02:35 PM
09 Nov 2004 10:16 PM
05 Nov 2004 07:31 PM
06 Sep 2004 06:44 PM
28 Aug 2004 07:04 PM
22 Aug 2004 04:21 PM
04 Sep 2003 10:48 PM
07 Aug 2003 09:13 PM
04 Aug 2003 09:34 AM
08 Jul 2003 11:52 PM
12 Jun 2003 12:42 AM
13 May 2003 03:24 AM
19 Apr 2003 09:25 AM
18 Apr 2003 05:51 AM
17 Apr 2003 10:45 PM
15 Apr 2003 12:30 PM
07 Apr 2003 10:34 PM
06 Apr 2003 01:06 PM
22 Mar 2003 07:14 PM
21 Mar 2003 08:57 PM
17 Mar 2003 05:42 AM
14 Mar 2003 05:01 AM
13 Mar 2003 11:47 AM
11 Mar 2003 08:13 PM
10 Mar 2003 11:35 PM
07 Mar 2003 02:06 AM
06 Mar 2003 11:40 PM
23 Feb 2003 07:25 PM
06 Jan 2003 04:01 PM
04 Jan 2003 01:58 AM
31 Dec 2002 05:14 PM
29 Dec 2002 01:20 AM
21 Dec 2002 01:45 AM
18 Nov 2002 10:50 PM
10 Nov 2002 01:55 AM
06 Nov 2002 06:46 PM
01 Oct 2002 12:24 PM
27 Sep 2002 02:03 PM
04 Sep 2002 01:17 PM
07 Jul 2002 02:11 PM
20 Jun 2002 01:28 AM
18 Jun 2002 08:51 PM
17 Apr 2002 01:45 AM
12 Apr 2002 02:35 AM
25 Mar 2002 11:36 PM
22 Mar 2002 02:04 PM
12 Mar 2002 02:09 AM
03 Mar 2002 11:49 PM
22 Feb 2002 11:40 PM
19 Feb 2002 06:37 PM
17 Feb 2002 08:51 PM
10 Feb 2002 08:27 AM
08 Feb 2002 08:17 PM
04 Feb 2002 01:26 AM
03 Feb 2002 07:44 PM
01 Feb 2002 07:38 PM
22 Jan 2002 03:39 AM
12 Jan 2002 05:26 PM
08 Jan 2002 04:05 AM
07 Jan 2002 02:48 AM
04 Jan 2002 10:41 PM
02 Jan 2002 09:40 PM
30 Dec 2001 02:43 PM
29 Dec 2001 08:40 PM
23 Dec 2001 11:36 PM
22 Dec 2001 02:06 PM
21 Dec 2001 11:55 PM
20 Dec 2001 12:23 AM
19 Dec 2001 05:40 PM
18 Dec 2001 07:15 PM
17 Dec 2001 11:45 PM
16 Dec 2001 01:55 AM
14 Dec 2001 12:33 AM <--
13 Dec 2001 02:20 PM
12 Dec 2001 05:52 PM
11 Dec 2001 08:24 PM
08 Dec 2001 03:08 AM
06 Dec 2001 01:52 AM
04 Dec 2001 02:47 PM
03 Dec 2001 02:07 AM
02 Dec 2001 07:34 PM
29 Nov 2001 10:28 PM
28 Nov 2001 04:02 PM
27 Nov 2001 07:45 PM
17 Nov 2001 06:03 PM
16 Nov 2001 05:26 PM
15 Nov 2001 02:54 PM
10 Nov 2001 11:41 PM
08 Nov 2001 07:40 PM
05 Nov 2001 06:27 PM
04 Nov 2001 05:29 AM
20 Oct 2001 01:53 PM
17 Oct 2001 10:59 PM
15 Oct 2001 07:03 PM
13 Oct 2001 08:18 PM
07 Oct 2001 10:16 PM
02 Oct 2001 10:02 AM
01 Oct 2001 12:13 AM
28 Sep 2001 10:41 PM
23 Sep 2001 03:09 AM

Return to The Donkey's Inn
 
This is a Moderated Forum for a small group of Democrats who have been unable to express political or economic opinion without harassment from bullies on open threads.

Bush and Cheney's Support for Vicious Attacks on Senator Daschle:
Message 16777183
Message 16775650
..........................................***********************.............................................................
Conservatives Support HATE Attacks on Senator Leahy
"Someone in Washington pushed the button to activate the far-right political network," said David Carle, Leahy's spokesman. "Thousands of folks were given scripts and asked to call, and there also were many hate calls and messages, including those in print."
Message 16787320
.........................................***************************...........................................................
Folks who Contributed or Offered Help to the Bush Campain.
ENRON:http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16781387
Akin, Gump: Message 16781291
Vasquez Director of Corps, See: Message 16781237
...........................................************************..........................................................

"By juggling Big Oil, defence, and government, at any rate, senior members of the US
(BUSH) administration have ensured that they have a finger in every possible pie."

( Opinion: siliconinvestor.com
............................................************************........................................................
Political Commentary:
democrats.org
AND
democrats.com
democrats.com
us.net
...........................................**********************............................................
Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe said:
"We now know why the Bush Social Security Commission met in secret: because it
plans to cut Social Security benefits and raise the retirement age. (12/11/2001)
democrats.org
See:http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16789731
........................................**********************.............................................
References: SHRUB by Molly Ivins and Lou Dubose,
Random House, Copyright 2000.

"The highlights of Ashcroft's new methods to spy on you," by Molly Ivins
(see: Message 16781455 )

Back Ground: Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, The Press & Project Truth by Robert Parry,
The Media Consortium, Arlington, Virginia, Copyright 1999 by Robert Perry.
PARRY ASKS:
>How did the vaunted Watergate press corps of the 70s become the Monica Lewinsky press corps of the 90s?
>What's real and what's not about cocaine trafficking by President Reagan's Nicaraguan contras?

( For opinion see Message 16706547 )

Taliban Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia by Ahmed Rashid, published in the United States by Yale University Press. Copyright 2000 by Ahmed Rashid. The author covered Afghanistan as a reporter for approximately 21 years.

ucomics.com.
.........................................***************************...........................................................
Arctic Oil: A Distraction, Not a Solution
Oil companies are after Alaska's Arctic Refuge, but drilling would deeply scar this majestic wilderness without solving our country's energy problems.

Spread the word: Send (a) letter from Robert Redford to friends and family.
nrdc.org
For additional information:
Message 16662802
.........................................................*******************.....................................................................
President Bush's energy plan won't work, because it makes the wrong choices. The Bush Administration energy plan ignores high-tech, energy-efficient solutions in favor of increased oil, gas, coal, and nuclear production, while his budget proposal slashes funding for renewable energy and efficiency by a third.

The Sierra Club realizes that we can't drill, dig or destroy our way out of our energy problems. That's why we're pushing for a more honest, balanced policy that promotes energy efficiency, uses clean renewable energy like wind and solar power, and emphasizes responsible production. Americans need an energy policy that provides quicker, cleaner, cheaper, and safer solutions. See what America would look like under the Bush energy plan. Where does he plan to put those 1,300 new power plants?
sierraclub.org
............................................................****************..............................................
Justice Deformed: War and the Constitution
"Americans must speak up
. We do not want history to record this as one of those mixed moments in which the behavior of our government failed to live up to the performance of our troops in the field. We do not want to remember this as a time when the nations of the world united in a campaign against terrorists, and then backed away when America attempted to prosecute foreign nationals in secret trials conducted according to unfair rules. "
New York Times Editorial, December 2, 2001
Message 16735016


USA: Presidential order on military tribunals threatens fundamental principles of justice

-- AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
November 15, 2001
Amnesty International is deeply troubled by the Military Order signed by President
George W. BUSH on 13 November allowing for the trial by special military
commissions of non-US citizens suspected of involvement in "international terrorism."

Since the attacks in the USA on 11 September, Amnesty International has been
calling for anyone suspected of involvement in these crimes to be brought to justice in
accordance with international standards for a fair trial. This sweeping presidential
order bypasses those fundamental principles, in contravention of US obligations under
international law, specifically the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
ratified by the USA in 1992. As such it is unacceptable and should be revoked.
amnesty.org
Last updated : November 15
(http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16744493)

For opinion see:http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16768014
Message 16741421
Message 16716460
Message 16705404
Message 16685494
............................................................*******************...............................................
.......................................THE PATRIOT ACT ..........................
house.gov
Acrobat viewer needed.

eff.org HTML the Act
eff.org
EFF Analysis (Electronic Frontier Foundation)

EFF Analysis Of The Provisions Of The USA PATRIOT Act

That Relate To Online Activities (Oct 31, 2001)
Introduction
On October 26, 2001, President BUSH signed the USA Patriot Act (USAPA) into law. With this
law we have given sweeping new powers to both domestic law enforcement and international
intelligence agencies and have eliminated the checks and balances that previously gave courts the
opportunity to ensure that these powers were not abused. Most of these checks and balances
were put into place after previous misuse of surveillance powers by these agencies, including the
revelation in 1974 that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S.
citizens, including Martin Luther King.

A Rush Job

The bill is 342 pages long and makes changes, some large and some small, to over 15 different
statutes. This document provides explanation and some analysis to the sections of the bill relating
to online activities and surveillance. Other sections, including those devoted to money laundering,
immigration and providing for the victims of terrorism, are not discussed here.

Yet even just considering the surveillance and online provisions of the USAPA, it is a large and
complex law that had over four different names and several versions in the five weeks between the
introduction of its first predecessor and its final passage into law. While containing some sections
that seem appropriate -- providing for victims of the September 11 attacks, increasing translation
facilities and increasing forensic cybercrime capabilities -- it seems clear that the vast majority of
the sections included have not been carefully studied by Congress, nor was sufficient time taken to
debate it or to hear testimony from experts outside of law enforcement in the fields where it makes
major changes. This concern is amplified because several of the key procedural processes
applicable to any other proposed laws, including inter-agency review, the normal committee and
hearing processes and thorough voting, were suspended for this bill.

Were our Freedoms the Problem?

The civil liberties of ordinary Americans have taken a tremendous blow with this law, especially
the right to privacy in our online communications and activities. Yet there is no evidence that our
previous civil liberties posed a barrier to the effective tracking or prosecution of terrorists. In fact,
in asking for these broad new powers, the government made no showing that the previous powers
of law enforcement and intelligence agencies to spy on US citizens were insufficient to allow them
to investigate and prosecute acts of terrorism. The process leading to the passage of the bill did
little to ease these concerns. To the contrary, they are amplified by the inclusion of so many
provisions that, instead of aimed at terrorism, are aimed at nonviolent, domestic computer crime.
In addition, although many of the provisions facially appear aimed at terrorism, the Government
made no showing that the reasons they failed to detect the planning of the recent attacks or any
other terrorist attacks were the civil liberties compromised with the passage of USAPA.

(See EFF SIite for a continuation of the analysis. You may be surprised to learn that the Bush Administration may spy on your Google or other internet searches)

The Bushies and ENRON

"Rep. Henry Waxman , a California Democrat and ranking member of the
Government Reform Committee, wrote to Vice President Richard Cheney seeking information on
Enron's possible influence on the Republican administration's energy policy.

I am writing to ask that you release information about secret contacts your energy taskforce had
with Enron Corporation,'' said the letter, which was dated Tuesday.

``Press reports indicate Enron -- a major Republican contributor -- had detailed communications with
the taskforce and other senior administration officials,'' Waxman wrote."
December 5, 2001,http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011205/pl/utilities_enron_.
See :http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16777296
Message 16753542
Opinion: Message 16764210
"Enron-gate: Where are the investigations of Bush's liaison with the bankrupt company" by Molly Ivins
(See: siliconinvestor.com