GREAT NEW MESSAGE BOARDS FOR DISCUSSION OF ALL THESE ISSUES
thesanitycheck.com
ncans.net
CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY
judiciary.senate.gov
DETAILED INFORMATION
part 1
businessjive.com
part 2
businessjive.com
part 3
businessjive.com
part 4
businessjive.com
media.corporate-ir.net
Sign this petition also for MARKET REFORM.
petitiononline.com
Best summaries of the issues
Message 21933009
Message 21889410
Message 21933072
Message 22856435
Naked Shorting
Discussion is encouraged about this issue. Is it a myth or one of the greatest financial scams of the new century? Who is involved? Hedge funds, management, touts, market makers? Why are shorts so upset when the subject is raised? Why do "bashers" bash?
Here are the 7 Senators interested in Reg SHO issues...
You can contact them all thru this link:
americaneedstoknow.com
1. Senator Collins
2. Senator Shelby
3. Senator Durbin
4. Senator Bennett
5. Senator Talent
6. Senator Salazar
7. Senator Dole
Sources of information
faulkingtruth.com
See their message board at
p097.ezboard.com
bobosrevenge.blogspot.com
counterfeitstocks.com
Message boards on IHUB where NAKED SHORTING IS DISCUSSED
investorshub.com
investorshub.com
RULES:
This thread is not intended to be one to bash members of SI, particularly because of their stock pics.
This thread is not intended to be one just to bash stock picks. Negative posts, ideally, should have links to filings or accurate statements of facts. A statement that XYZQ is a POS will likely cause the dreaded "BAN," perhaps with a prior warning, but maybe not.
Financers, vulture or otherwise, equity investors such as PIPE's, etc. This is a little tougher. I'd prefer something like "Here is a deal that may lead to lots of potential dilution. This financer has a history of doing them and then provide some links." I'd prefer that we don't have blanket statements that ALL their deals "suck," but maybe all their deals do, in fact, suck.
Touts, bashers, promoters, IR - etc. I would welcome posts from anybody, even if connected to a company, with opinions and factual links. For example, "This is a good promotion because the promoter is only getting a one time payment of $5000." or This is a SHAREHOLDER-FRIENDLY management. They are in there with shareholders and not raping shareholders with massive dilution. Their salaries and perks are reasonable, etc.
THIS IS NOT INTENDED AS A THREAD JUST TO POINT OUT BAD STUFF ALTHOUGH THAT IS HUMAN NATURE. LET'S FIND SOME COMPANIES THAT CAN BE CALLED "SHAREHOLDER FRIENDLY." Many consider those last 2 words to be an oxymoron, so let's see if we can find some that can be considered relatively friendly to us small retail investors.
Disagreements - Once opinions start getting repetitive, without adding anything, they start to become just mindless bashing and we all have been there. Warnings and ultimate "bans," may be remedies.
Legal CYA - no legal advice or opinions and no recommendations to buy, sell, hold, or just stare into the sun, (just checking to see if you are awake) are provided on any message boards. Anyone who relies on message board posters deserves and will likely lose all their money and wind up sitting in a homeless shelter, with no friends or relatives admitting to even know his or her name. Consider everything posted here and elsewhere on the internet as being from someone with his own personal agenda, misdirected, wrong, a lie, foolish, or some combination thereof. |
