Ahhh Jeffrey D aka JS - you had SI Bob remove your posts pertaining to litiguous innuendos and your inferences, by saying on July 5 the company had cause to sue me, I DON'T THINK SO - well, it appears you tried to get rid of some of your background huh? by having SI Bob remove your posts - BUT do not worry, I have kept them in a safe place - no delusion here buddy - for instance here is a response by me to your now () post - you will have to remember what you wrote; without a hard copy, your memory will fade but the FACTS will be available. Running for cover there Jeffrey D aka JS? You are going to be busy trying to remember just what you did and did not say if you don't have hard copies of all the posts you have had SI Bob remove for you.
And we have your Bud - To: Jeffrey D ( ) From: Jon C Monday, Jul 5 1999 12:07PM ET Reply # of 1922
Jeff,
Dale mentioned the cultural differences the other day and this is another example. I have never heard of this in the UK. Howver where the intrepid Americans go the Uk usually follows (Usually in about 15 years((we(not me mind) are a consevative bunch and the average brit does not like to see his neighbour being succesful)) Regards
Jon C
Next Previous
Not only that but in another response to your threat of one of your posts still on the board, here is a comment and I am not the author of this comment:
It would be interesting to see XSNI try to sue someone for asking questions, like whether XSNI will release financial information commonly available for other companies with a NASDAQ listing or aspiring to have one.
my post 1787 link text below Message 10385022 To: Jeffrey D ( ) From: Jacalyn Deaner Monday, Jul 5 1999 12:49PM ET Reply # of 1921
JS: FWIW - your presumption about bashing - let them sue a shareholder who has asked for clarification when it was found out Lehman's could not and would not acknowledge XSNI which manning said was being moved to the "corrected" listing by Lehmans, and that along with that listing corrction, it would become the IPO. Andy Laslow @ Lehman's UK - "What makes you think an OTCBB would even be considered for an IPO? And prove that XSNI is xstream UK." Also don't forget "our man of integrity" in the UK, Mike Langdon who posted lots of information and provided names and dates via emails - and all I wanted was confirmation by manning or an officer of the corporation and third party verification, which to date has been absent. Your inference is heard loudly and clearly JS, however, the publicity would do manning no good and I am just a shareholder with some valid concerns. Ever hear of a frivilous law suit. Go ask your buddies on the Lars thread. Could be a great avenue for discovery and to find out exactly what XSNI consists of. As I have indicated throughout my posts on this thread, all of my documentation is in public records, past documents in courts the UK exchange, the US papers, etc. All I have been doing is requesting clarification, and all questions began as soon as Lehmans UK would not substantiate manning's claims. Frivolous, and I could countersue as well :) - this has taken such a toll...
As for GAAY, you are slimey johnny come lately as usual. but in this case, better late than never; do some dd - you will find your beloved profitpicks happened to select a good stock for once. Thank god I do other dd underground, so you don't get hold of my other holdings and latch onto them too. |