Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Janice Shell who wrote (9087)	3/2/1998 9:38:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	of 20981

>>And as noted previously, special prosecutors assigned to investigate public officials should be restricted to investigating ONLY matters having to do with said officials' conduct of their office. Anything else can be dealt with through ordinary channels. Wanna go after Clinton for illegal campaign contributions? Okay. "Travelgate"? Not so sure. Whitewater? No. Adultery? Certainly not. The expanding investigation is not at all Starr's fault, it is a reflection of Clinton and the law. The actual difference between this investigation and others is that no IC ever experienced a President so globally corrupt. Look at virtually any aspect of Clinton's life and you'll find corruption. The IC statute mandates and compels the IC to follow the stench. It is wrongheaded to decry Starr when it is hardly Starr's fault that Clinton is the biggest stinker to come along.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next