SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : IMPEACH GRAY DAVIS!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: calgal who wrote (1445)10/4/2003 12:57:04 PM
From: calgal   of 1641
 
Actor rejects need to identify all donors now
By Barry Witt and Mary Anne Ostrom
Mercury News

Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger said Friday it shouldn't matter to voters if they know who all his campaign donors are before the Oct. 7 recall election.

``You know something, when the voters vote for me they're voting for me because they trust me. Always when you vote for somebody you have to have trust,'' Schwarzenegger said in an interview. He was responding to criticism earlier this week that he had exploited a campaign-finance loophole by loaning $4.5 million to his campaigns with the expectation that donors would repay him later.

``I will always let anyone know whatever checks come in,'' said Schwarzenegger, who has made political reform a major theme of his campaign. ``They can see it. What does it matter if they read it now? . . . If it is before or after the election, the rules will stay the same. I will not take money from the special interests, from any of the unions, or Indian gaming.''

Proposition 34, the voter-approved campaign-finance measure, prohibited candidates from making loans of more than $100,000 to their campaigns. The purpose was to ensure that candidates would have to make public the names of people funding their campaigns before the election. But the state Fair Political Practices Commission decided last year that the limit did not apply if a candidate obtained a personal loan from a bank and flipped it to his campaign.

``Personal loans are troublesome because, unlike direct contributions by the candidate to his own campaign, they raise the prospect that a winning candidate will raise contributions after the election to pay himself back from groups that have interests in front of him as a newly elected official,'' Jim Knox, executive director of California Common Cause, wrote in e-mail Friday to reporters.

``This prevents the public from knowing the identity of a candidate's financial backers until after the election, and also creates the impression that those contributions will be more influential,'' Knox wrote.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext