Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 37.81

-4.3%

Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (151227)	12/5/2001 6:08:06 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (3) of 186894

Tencusatsu, Take a look at my posts to TGPTNDR I just posted on the mod thread: Message 16751556 Message 16751900 a section of code that does tons of pipeline flushes will obviously run faster on a shorter pipeline. Regarding how fast the decode logic works, Kap's program proves nothing. Can you be more specific? IMO, the code that Kap came up with is I think very good at isolating the decoder from the things you mention. I think we could just change the ADD instruction inside each of thos cases to something that is guaranteed to use the complex decoder or Piii to take care of a valid point wbmw came up with. Another thing I would be curious about is how exactly the case statement is executed, and how the table for it is built up. I see these 2 as valid concerns. If you have any other concerns, let us know. Joe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next