SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Hensley who wrote (16946)7/17/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Zoltan!   of 20981
 
Specious argument.

There is no indication, other than the usual WH mouthpieces, that Starr wants such testimony.

However, I am inclined to believe that Starr can get such testimony if his wishes because if Clinton did speak with his attorneys in front of the SS, then he waived the attorney-client privilege .

That means that not only that the SS can testify on such matters, but Slick's attorneys (most of which are not really his anyway - as they work for US) can be compelled to testify also. That includes even those who Clinton actually employs as personal attorneys, like Bennett. Remember this issue is before the Court of Appeals in another guise - Clinton's use of government attorneys as personal attorneys has already been found to not be covered by the attorney-client privilege.

But what is new and should be especially troubling to all is the apparent witness tampering by Clinton's lawyers - and to the extent they are government-paid, then against the interests of their real clients, the US public.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News