>Heck, you gots me. That's a term of
endearment, assuming you are an "inea".<
By this gracious admission you very narrowly escaped having your mouth washed out with soap.
>I cannot fathom for a moment why women
support Clinton so disproportionately.<
But my good pal Zolt, can't you see that I have not supported Clinton? I have in fact described him quite viciously. "Liar" comes to mind, and "rogue," and "a sexual compulsive," and "out of control," "a low life," and "a dog," and more such. I also pointed out that doling out government jobs, which is apparently the way he paid off a number of his ladies, is a crime.
But I don't see the world as black and white, and that exceedingly negative opinion of Clinton coexists in my mind with the belief I expressed earlier, which colors my reaction to both Lewinsky's and Willey's self-portrayals:
"I would venture to guess that each of the
players in this tragic farce is massaging his or
her history to make him or her self feel (and
look) as good, as virtuous, as much an innocent
victim as possible."
(But what is an inea? To qualify for the endearment, I will declare myself one on faith, trusting you.) |
