SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : My House

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: thames_sider who wrote (2093)10/4/2002 12:52:14 PM
From: Lazarus_Long   of 7689
 
End tax exemptions, reduce sales taxes on non-luxury goods, and increase taxes on luxuries.
In the grips of the green monster, are we?

Why should the rich pay a higher percentage than anyone else? Because you want to punish them for your own failings?

In which case, the only thing to stop you being smug must be the knowledge that your children are likely to have a lower standard of living than you, and your grandchildren still worse.
And why would that be?

The rich pay a *lower* proportion of their income as tax than all but the very poorest, with the super-rich coming off best.
And it's still true that per capita they pay more.

Meanwhile, since the richest 5% (or 10%, I forget) have ~40% of the wealth, isn't it right that they should pay ~40% of the tax?
DANG! I thought it was called an INCOME tax, not a WEALTH tax!
Your jealousy, f course, thinks it ought to be a wealth tax. If I have more than you, I must have stolen it.

Gee, I can't begin to understand why Britain was called "The Poor Man of Europe" for so many decades. Until Margaret Thatcher cleaned out your statist socialist groupthink from the gov't and got the country moving again.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext