SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : STOCKS FOR THE COMING CONFLICT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3028)9/7/2004 12:01:27 AM
From: ksuave   of 3054
 
Bush wants to shift $3.3 billion to strengthen Iraq security
Funds would be diverted from rebuilding projects

Tyler Marshall, Los Angeles Times
Monday, September 6, 2004

Washington -- The Bush administration is preparing to seek congressional approval to divert $3.3 billion earmarked to rebuild Iraq's shattered infrastructure into programs focused mainly to establish law and order. [touching some companies discussed here, it would seem.]

The move comes against a backdrop of steadily deteriorating public security in the country as it approaches a crucial first round of elections set for January.

Those working on the changes said the proposed reallocation amounts to nearly one-fifth of the $18.4 billion Congress approved last November to rebuild Iraq. They said the shift would delay vital electricity, water and sewage projects -- all crucial to restoring Iraq's economy and building public support for the country's struggling interim government.

Instead, the money would go to an array of other programs, including $1.8 billion to strengthen the government's shaky security organizations and additional funds to soak up unemployment. In a country where idle men with little hope for work make easy recruits for a virulent insurgency, job creation is closely linked to improved security.

In part, the changes reflect a reordering of priorities after the June 28 transfer of sovereignty to the Iraqis from the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority that administered the nation after the fall of Saddam Hussein. That shift left U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte, rather than CPA administrator Paul Bremer, the highest-ranking American in the country.

At another level, however, the move underscores the administration's assessment that substantial changes are necessary to control an insurgency that has grown in strength and sophistication despite U.S. military efforts to contain it. Officials at the State Department working on the reconstruction revisions said the shift in focus is part of a realization that funding even the most important projects makes little sense if conditions on the ground prevent their completion.

"The first priority for our effort right now has to be security," Secretary of State Colin Powell told reporters last week. "If a place is not safe to build a sewer system, you can't spend the money."

The revised spending plan calls for adding 45,000 new recruits to the national police force, raising 20 new battalions to the current 42-battalion Iraqi National Guard, and beefing up the force that patrols Iraq's long frontiers in an attempt to stem the flow of illegal traffic, including armed fighters crossing into Iraq from countries such as Iran and Syria.

Those familiar with the reallocation said new money is also proposed for two other security organizations -- a paramilitary force to deal with civil threats to public order and an elite unit to guard dignitaries in much the way the U.S. Secret Service protects leading members of the American government.

The shift of priorities, initially drawn up at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, is expected to be reviewed at a meeting this week in Washington of senior officials from several government agencies before going to Capitol Hill for final approval. There is no sign of major opposition to the changes and those familiar with the issue predicted that Congress probably will ratify the revised plan by the end of this month.

"There will be a lot of questions asked and there may be a hearing, but in general people want to be receptive to this," said a congressional aide who requested anonymity. "There's a recognition that the realities (in Iraq) are much different than they were last fall" when Congress originally approved the budget.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext