Can you possibly do anything but deny, whine, and claim that you did not say things that are DIRECT QUOTES? As a FRAUD, you do quite well. As a basher you keep blowing it. Your denials are addressed in #reply-8592935 where I did provide links. I guess that since you just came on shift, you have failed to read the thread and do not know that I documented your fraud not only with quotes, but also with links. You really do enjoy shooting yourself in the foot, don't you? If cramming your own posts, word for word, down your throat is brow beating, then so be it. Wah Wah Wah
No matter how much you deny it, you tried to misrepresent what I said. Not only that, but you have posted links to the very posts that show your FRAUD. Granted, along with those links you have only copied the small parts that tend to support your position, but that is the difference between your posts and mine. You take little bits and try to make them into something that was never said, while I take your entire post as it is and cram your FRAUD down your throat with it.
As to this crap about contractors and consultants that you seem to keep telling me that I know to be true: I know nothing of the kind. According to you, "some poster on RB" said it. In your mind, that makes it fact? Hahahahahahahahahahah Irrelevant babble sweety.
Just for your own fraudulent self:
You just said <<<<First with jhild and the qui tam episodes, then here with me in your claiming I said something I did not.>>>>> You already blew it trying to defend jhild. As you know, I posted the links that crammed his FRAUD down his throat yet again. Like I promised, everytime you go back there you are going to have to eat that FRAUD all over again. Don't you tire of being shown to be a FRAUD?
Well, remember this?
I said: Rather, it is just another piece of credibility for the company. It goes like this: Panam has, as its director of R&D a person who is so qualified and so involved in cutting edge technology that he is selected for this honor, and it is indeed an honor. From this you are perhaps thinking that if such a professional is on the PABN team, then PABN must be a bit more than a scam and actual R&D must be going on. What R&D? Heck, I dunno, but neither do you. All we do know is that we are amassing a stable full of professionals who can get the job done, don't you think? #reply-8573693
You chose to only take one little piece and infer that I said something I never said at all.
What you copied and said was:
"The fact that Larry is presenting does not speak to the "Big Time". Rather, it is
just another piece of credibility for the company."
Does it really? Isn't he and the other "boys" hired consultants? I seem to have
read a post on the bull that somebody had quite a lengthy phone conversation
with someone and his post explained that these gentlemen were consultants to
PanAm. And given Mr. Roof's background (published programming books)
coupled with the fact that this is really an educational seminar (read the Microsoft
links), I am wondering just how much exposure PanAm will really get out of this.
Doesn't it really seem more likely that he's going to tout the billing program that
he created (I believe he may be the creator)? These computer professionals will
not be interested in the health services division of PanAm. What is more probable
is that they will be interested in the programming of said item. So, the question is
what is there really to get excited about for PanAm stock holders? The fact that
PanAm has hired consultants to program for them? #reply-8577542
I suppose that you will now deny that any of that was ever said, yet you just linked your message to the source. OOPS, you really did not mean to do that, did you? Hahahahahahah
Well, any reader of normal intelligence can tell that I never said anything about exposure PABN would get at Microsoft. The only issue I addressed was the qualifications of Larry. Like I told you the record speaks for itself. You changed what I said by only posting a small part of it and then inferring that I had talked about exposure Panam would receive at the seminar. I never addressed exposure in any way at all, now did I, Ms. FRAUD?
|
