Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sedohr Nod who wrote (9681)	3/4/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) of 20981

Out all that has gone on in this sorry mess, Starr's slips don't excuse the President's actions. I agree this in no way excuses Clinton. I happen to think though that if we lose the confidentiality of attorney and client conversations, our system will have suffered a far greater harm than the crimes that are being investigated. We will have moved much closer to an authoritarian system, that recognizes no personal freedoms. I would be surprised to hear Libertarians support this kind of action. This current subpoena is currently being argued over just these grounds in front of a Judge. It will be shocking to me if the Judge upholds this unprecedented revision of a long established principle. It is already shocking to me that Starr's view of our Republic and our legal process has allowed him to even seek such a subpoena. I cannot accept the notion that the end justifies the means.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next