A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jack Jagernauth who wrote (7895)	7/7/1999 1:04:00 PM
From: OldAIMGuy	Read Replies (1) of 18928

Hi Jack, The stock had "shifted" to a lower trading range $6 to $9 in recent times and although I was profitable and trading profitably in that range, the stock had not lived up to my initial or ongoing expectations. Like most of the tech stocks I review, I was hoping for sales and book value to be doubling in a 3-5 year time horizon. Not only had that not occurred, but the future had become less and less clear for the company as they hurried to catch the next semiconductor wave. They always seemed to arrive a bit late for the party. So, in the end, it was frustration that ended the investment. I guess I could have continued to AIM it but felt that the money was better placed someplace else. Best regards, Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next