it seems obvious to everyone else on this thread that PC speaks straight
Well, sorry to break this to you Roger, but I have yet another example of PCM violating your faith in his being a straight shooter. And the violation happened just this morning.
In this post he still passes off the old information regarding the share count. He does not acknowledge that the PPM/Form D is in direct conflict with the numbers that he quotes. And, this from a man who spouts that one should always rely upon the "authorative source". I don't know why he continues to promote the numbers on the company website which predate the numbers that John Schmitz submitted to the SEC in March, unless, it's for the purpose to mislead others. Can you think of another reason?
ragingbull.com
I have pointed out to him that he is in direct violation of SEC regulations on numerous occasions, here is one such incidence...
PCM, you really ought to update this post to show the proper number of shares out. If you do not do so, I will conclude that you are purposely misleading new investors, something the SEC highly frown upon. Shame, shame, shame.
b.To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or....
law.uc.edu
ragingbull.com
well, if you look at the post he submitted to new shareholders after this last time I pointed out that he was in direct violation of SEC regulations, he added a small disclaimer at the very bottom of the post. In order to find it you really have to scroll down through a lot of information. So, Roger, does this person really appear to be a straight shooter to you? |
