My opinions are based on the information that is available.
Hog wash. Problem is your posts are presented as declarations and not stated as opinions, whether they be right or not, mostly not. For example, how about the time you insisted that the shares from the PPM are restricted when in fact they are not. It's clearly stated in the PPM that the shares are not restricted but you had to argue with wireless wonk about this very issue. And, he proved you wrong.
The information I post is based on information that is available.
Major problem is that the information you choose to represent is outdated and you know this as it's been pointed out to you on numerous occasions. And this is a big no, no according to the SEC, they are very clear on this.
b.To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or....
law.uc.edu
Someone may read the same information and have a different opinion. If it is a valid opinion it should be defensible based on the information available.
An opinion is one thing but to disregard factual information and post erroneous/outdated information in it's place is a totally different issue. An opinion is generally formed when there is something to interpret, however, there is nothing to interpret when reading the Form D/PPM that John Schmitz signed and delivered to the SEC on March 23rd regarding the fact that there are now 880 Million Outstanding shares and 1.75 Billion Authorized.
geocities.com
So, to say your opinion differs as the reason you declare different numbers is absurd and won't hold up in a court of law. You are purposely misrepresenting information and you know this, otherwise you would present all the information and let the individual make up his or her own mind.
|
