WCOM Message Board - Msg: 11376140

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WCOM

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Anthony Wong who wrote (5062)	9/27/1999 5:24:00 PM
From: Eric L	Read Replies (1) of 11568

Anthony. << WorldCom's Brute Strength >> Good post. I like this excerpt: "A long-distance play, just to get at a wireless move? Or, god forbid, a long-distance play just for the merits of a long-distance play." As JDN says, "Attornies delight". It has long seemed to me that the logical entity for WCOM to get into the wireless world via, is the VSTR/OMPT/AERL emerging merger. For the reason stated above. It seems it would be easier and cleaner than the FON/PCS thing. Disclosure: I hold OMPT & VSTR as well as WCOM. The above statement is sort of why. Someone (US or Europe) is going to acquire them (VoiceStream), IMO. As stated in prior posts, I think WCOM should be in wireless. Nextel's technology seems a bit out of the main stream. The Sprint thing is complicated. Would Sprint spin off PCS alone. That makes sense to me, but I don't know why Sprint would want to do that (also needs to be in wireless). The FON/PCS thing is ... that Attornies delight. Whew! - Eric -

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next