SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: OldAIMGuy who wrote (9402)11/30/1999 1:46:00 AM
From: Jack Jagernauth  Read Replies (1) of 18928
 
Hi Tom and everyone,
On the subject of increasing risk and Vealies, here is a scenario for discussion purposes.

Let's say, for example, that I am in a fund which is moving right along, i.e., going up. I pull a Vealie, and another Vealie. Then, the momentum slows, the NAV goes flat and starts to decline. Maybe the tide has turned for a while, and the next thing that happens is, I get an AIM buy signal where I pulled the first Vealie.

So, what gives? Why should I buy where I was supposed to sell in the first place?

Okay, I say to myself, my approach is to look at fundamentals; are the fundamentals still fine? However, the 'fundamentals' with funds just might be too weird to try to figure out. So, I ask myself, is there more upside potential than downside risk with this fund?

Here is a sacrilegious thought. With funds, would it make sense to pull Vealies while the momentum is strong and take money off the table when the momentum slows? If the cash reserve exceeds 35%, no problem; I could just move the excess cash elsewhere.

What are your thoughts?

Regards, Jack
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext