Re: Timeline, Polygraph test, etc.
Here is the timeline as reported in the New Haven Register:
=====
She left the Best Buddies party at 8:30 p.m., dropped off a classmate and went to her apartment at 256 Park St. She was next seen on Old Campus, and, at 9:25 p.m., was spotted by a classmate walking north on College Street toward Elm Street.
At 9:40 p.m., East Rock Road was disrupted, and witnesses would later tell police they heard a man and a woman arguing.
At 9:45 p.m., the witnesses would say, they heard a woman screaming and, 10 minutes later, an emergency 911 call was made to police.
At 9:58 p.m. Dec. 4, 1998, police arrived at the intersection of East Rock and Edgehill and found Jovin covered in blood. She died at Yale-New Haven Hospital of 17 stab wounds to the back and neck. She was 21 years old.
Message 12191389
=====
The walk from Phelps Gate to where she was found is about 2 miles-- uphill. That's about 30-40 minutes non-stop. As 10-20 minutes later arguing and screams were heard at the murder scene, in order for them to be related to the murder one would have to assume Suzanne was driven there. Even if she was last seen 5-10 minutes further up College Street it still doesn't allow her to make it to the murder scene unless not only did she pick up the pace, but she was joined by the murderer who kept on walking with her. The point here being that a car most likely was used, in which case you'd have to assume Suzanne and the murderer parked and got out. The police did indeed check Jim's car and found nothing, nor any evidence he scrubbed it clean for that matter. As someone here also pointed out, once you conclude Suzanne at some point had to have been in a car, you pretty much have to cross Jim off your list of suspects.
Recall that police didn't have the timeline set nor any hard theories in place when they first talked to Jim. At that point -- I'm guessing -- you volunteer to do whatever it takes to get yourself eliminated as a suspect in order to move the case forward. You're not really worried about the results because you figure even if they are inconclusive there will doubtlessly be others called in for questioning and perhaps the real killer(s) will be found shortly.
Now, a year later, you conclude the police have nothing and the whole world is looking at you simply because no one has given them any other place to look. At that point you have to wonder a) what if the test is inconclusive; i.e. you don't think you'll fail but these things aren't 100% accurate and you never know, b) if you pass, will that really help you or will the police spin the test as "flawed" and still refuse to exonerate you, and c) shouldn't you force the police to explain why they think you are a suspect in the first place and why even suggesting you take one isn't harassment?
I have not talked to Jim about this. If it were me, I'd be damn sure I knew what I was getting myself into. I'd probably have demands like control over who administered the test, and, when I pass, that I expect the chief of police to admit his department spent a year pursuing the wrong person, botched the investigation, will call in the FBI, and then resign. How about you?
I have a lunch appointment now but will be back to address the other important points you raised a bit later.
- Jeff |
