A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: aptus who wrote (13043)	10/4/2000 9:33:47 AM
From: Jack Jagernauth	Read Replies (2) of 18928

Hi Mark, I am sorry, at this time, I am not sure of the value of the 0 - 1000 relative measure as a tool for determining AIM-ability. The reason I say that is, I compared the numbers generated for two stocks I own (GAC.TO and CTRA.TO) and the numbers don't make sense, based on what I already know about these two stocks. After thinking about it some more, I feel that the other method I used for determining AIM-ability provides a more realistic view of things. Why not run simulations in PCA, or your software, and see how many trades the stock generates per year using standard AIM parameters? To me, that is a more pragmatic way to determine AIM-ability. Regards, Jack

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next