SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (41613)11/28/2000 9:24:37 PM
From: SE  Read Replies (2) of 44573
 
I think I will have to put it down as a 1D day. I would think possibly a VT, but the V happened so early, that the T was more of a move than a T. LOL! If you know what I mean. In English, one way down. The tail at the end of the day was not a tail, in my thinking, but a move. So definitely a one way down.

Damnest thing. I had the pattern right, but was way off on the times...almost like it compressed on me. The last down move was unexpected by me. However, I caught a nice chunk of it once I realized the pattern compressed the time element on me. I expected to see the pattern from the open to 14:00 today stretched for the entire day. The late weakness has me concerned. Not sure what to make of it...maybe nothing.

Just checked out Dallas. He has the same A shaped flows I do. I see he picked 11/25/98 as one of the days. I went to my work to see why I did not pick that day as that is in my database. He does it differently than I do. I compare only WEEK 1 to WEEK 1. 11/25/98 is a WEEK 2 DAY 4. I have tomorrow as a WEEK 1 DAY 3, so I don't have a clue what he is doing. Perhaps my count is all wet or something...I dunno. I also compared the action on 11/23/98 and 11/24/98 to what we saw the last couple days and even though 11/24/98 looks similar to today, 11/23/98 doesn't look anything like yesterday. I try to find a match of the prior two days and it looks like he uses the prior day and ignores the cycle weeks and days in his analysis.

Maybe you can shed some light....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News