One could also call "it" exporting wealth, depending on what
"it" means, easier than the question about what "is" is.
My personal view is that the handset market demands a somewhat
broader understanding of human aspects than "that",
from component allocations, logistics, production,
delivery systems (logistics, bad in 95) and end user
needs.
Another goodie from the Q-thread:
Message 15378231
(thanks to Ben G)
----
For Mr. Lindberg, the London analyst, the U.S. approach makes much more sense.
"European governments will have to rethink their license requirements," he says. "It is lunacy to build six 3G
networks across Germany."
----
Not that good for Mr Klemperer, the econo-mist from
Cambridge, the hero of the UK-style auctions, but
fast retracting his theories.
Additionally Germany is the only place were 3G networks
have a chance to work and be profitable, but I guess
that's a problem in London, mostly profiting as
an EU tax evasion paradise, a general EU pain in the bt.
The pain of the french pushing great London based companies
to the edge of insolvency is also great, almost hilarious.
Ilmarinen.
Untiting USA wasn't easy, and nobody promised London-UK
would be easier for Europe, Scotland nor Wales. |
