SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dr.MensaWannabe who wrote (1268)5/7/2001 12:44:56 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) of 5315
 
Of course, FACTS should be the ultimate determinant in this regard.

They seem to be hard to come by.

BTW, I differentiate what is happening WRT to a potential court case and what happens in this forum. 2 hugely different venues.

Absolutely , I agree that Tim Luke should have every recourse in defending his position.

And as of yet, I still have no definitive understanding as to what his position is in a legal sense.

And yes, he has no "burden" to "explain himself" regarding his legal case, although he has expended considerable energy on the "forum" side.

As far as any judges dismissal, I based that comment on your description, not Tim Luke's. I'm sure if he gets as far as a courtroom, he'll have a clearly defined case.

At least I hope so...if not, let's further hope his attorney is on a contingency basis.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News