SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2
An SI Board Since April 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5315 66 0
Emcee:  Neenny Type:  Unmoderated
Part 1

Started By: Jorj X. McKie
Date: Apr 11, 2001 9:47 PM
What will be the determining factor for success?

My vote:

Bob

investorshub.com

Subject 51081

Part 2
Is currently and will remain unmoderated in the fine "tradition" of SI. <ggg>

This subject was started for everyeone, so that the converstion could be continued, while SI tries to figure out how to unmoderate Part 1.
It is getting difficult for some of us to have to sit back and just lurk!!!
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5315Bob Z always said the key to a good message board site is to keep the interface greg s27/28/2010
5314Where did you go to?? JaneJane4IceCream-8/5/2007
5313I haven't been here in a while. I like what you did with this site. CongratSirVinny-12/29/2005
5312Blonds Have More Fun, and... . IH members have more fun than SI members. . IH md:oug-7/21/2005
5311Matt, Bob, Dave only see strength and weaponry... but otters see it differdentlld:oug-7/20/2005
5310Contest - Estimate SI's public stock worth... . Lets assume 2007 is when SI d:oug-7/19/2005
5309greg-s getting under Matt's skin caused... Message 21518426 ... a "red d:oug-7/19/2005
5308Correct! Stuff dripping off my chin is not chocolate milk. . For sure Matt, Bob d:oug-7/19/2005
5307What <u>exactly</u> were the TOU's that I violated? Is getting greg s-7/18/2005
5306It is you who poison the site. You banned, jailed, booted me when I violated nogreg s-7/18/2005
5305Hey, suck up, you sure that white stuff dripping off your chin is milk?Done, gone.-7/18/2005
5304What is there to discuss? You spread poison on my site for months. You have anMatt Brown-7/18/2005
5303"different matter here [not] with Matt in charge" . SI | Five Dollars d:oug-7/18/2005
5302I'm sure you are right. The kid doesn't have the maturity to discuss thgreg s-7/17/2005
5301<i> simply want him to try to explain his admin actions in my particular cDone, gone.-7/17/2005
5300Care to discuss openly, for a change? Message 21513731greg s-7/17/2005
5299Well, Michal, I'm not going to anoint Matt Brown with angry epithets. Nor agreg s-7/17/2005
5298iHub is an avoid, top to bottom. Always was. I only scan it to see what the scDone, gone.-7/17/2005
5297FWIW, just wanted to let you know I got <u><b>booted</u></bgreg s-7/17/2005
5296Whether placing an ignore in someone's account is an "administrative acSI Bob-7/16/2005
5295Matt [abuse] tool [against] poster who violated no TOU ... reality bites ... chd:oug-7/11/2005
5294Bob, After reading your verbose reply, I see you do not agree with me. I am cogreg s-7/10/2005
5293<i>What would you think of a site admin who went into a user's accountSI Bob-7/7/2005
5292Bob, What would you think of a site admin who went into a user's account angreg s-7/7/2005
5291circa 2/6/2001 SI Admin (Bob) has been fired. Now the real story can be told...d:oug-3/8/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):